Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:07:59 +0100, Peter Smyth wrote:
All Metronet lines are now suspended, including parts of the Piccadilly where it runs over such lines. Anyone know why it is considered safe for Chiltern to run over the Metronet maintained Amersham - Harrow section, but not safe for the Met to do the same? Presumably because Chiltern have enough non-RMT drivers to be able to run the Aylesbury via Amersham service. They also run over a non-Metronet route (the route via High Wycombe), so they can stick all the RMT drivers on that one. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 11:15 pm, asdf wrote:
All Metronet lines are now suspended, including parts of the Piccadilly where it runs over such lines. Anyone know why it is considered safe for Chiltern to run over the Metronet maintained Amersham - Harrow section, but not safe for the Met to do the same? Presumably because Chiltern have enough non-RMT drivers to be able to run the Aylesbury via Amersham service. They also run over a non-Metronet route (the route via High Wycombe), so they can stick all the RMT drivers on that one. Also, AIUI there isn't a very high proportion of RMT drivers on National Rail compared to LUL - they're mostly ASLEF (I might be completely wrong on that - it's from memory rather than Sourced Fact). -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B wrote:
On Sep 3, 11:15 pm, asdf wrote: Anyone know why it is considered safe for Chiltern to run over the Metronet maintained Amersham - Harrow section, but not safe for the Met to do the same? Presumably because Chiltern have enough non-RMT drivers to be able to run the Aylesbury via Amersham service. They also run over a non-Metronet route (the route via High Wycombe), so they can stick all the RMT drivers on that one. Also, AIUI there isn't a very high proportion of RMT drivers on National Rail compared to LUL - they're mostly ASLEF (I might be completely wrong on that - it's from memory rather than Sourced Fact). I don't know what the situation is like now - but about twelve or fifteen years ago the Chiltern line was a-typical to the rest of the system, in that it had a very high proportion of RMT drivers (they might still have been NUR then), rather than ASLEF men. I recall happily travelling to and from work during one dispute, when most of the national network was at a standstill, due to "the wrong type of union". |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Later running tube plan suspended | London Transport | |||
Bakerloo line suspended due to vandalism | London Transport | |||
WARNPASS: Disruption to airport links | London Transport | |||
Northern Line suspended | London Transport | |||
Kew Bridge Bus Lane Suspended | London Transport |