| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
April 10th 08, 12:15 PM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Thameslink NGEMU procurement - now in motion
EE507 wrote:
On Apr 9, 11:48 am, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/5asy9b http://tinyurl.com/5deoog I love the fact that at the end of a highly detailed, demanding technical specification for a train that is meant to be suitable for metro-style ATO as well as Kings Lynn to Eastbourne runs, there is the following: "Maintenance downtimes must be significantly reduced from the current increasing trend that has arisen due to unnecessary sophistication". So - having read through the spec a few times, which of the sophisticated technologies that the DfT have listed are the unnecessary ones? Paul |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Exciting news on Thameslink 2000 (now "Thameslink Project") | London Transport | |||
| Concorde! on BBC2 now | London Transport | |||
| Help!!!! What happens now! Buying ticket from ticket tout | London Transport | |||
| Help!!!! What happens now! Buying ticket from ticket tout | London Transport | |||
| East London Extension now has its own website | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
