Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 27, 1:05 am, Mr Thant
wrote: On 27 May, 00:29, MIG wrote: So that still leaves a mysterious bit of track removal on the previously two-track section a bit further west. The only way that could go two-way would be by creating a flat junction on the Westferry side, which can't be the plan. It was always two north/westbound tracks which merged, but now merge further east. Have a look at this diagram:http://tinyurl.com/42v2d4 The red bit is the new dive under. The yellow bit is the existing flyover. Ignore the red cross. By where it says DLT 1 there's some hatching on a section of the eastbound track, which is the bit to be demolished. Below the hatching are the two westbound tracks. One of these will be used temporarily to get eastbound trains from the flyover to West India Quay. And that's why they've made the two westbound tracks merge before they get to this area. U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London Will the diveunder mean that trains from Bank won't be able to access the centre platform at Canary Whard to reverse? Do any bank services terminate at Canary Wharf at the moment, or is it just trains from Stratford? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May, 13:12, brixtonite wrote:
On May 27, 1:05 am, Mr Thant wrote: On 27 May, 00:29, MIG wrote: So that still leaves a mysterious bit of track removal on the previously two-track section a bit further west. *The only way that could go two-way would be by creating a flat junction on the Westferry side, which can't be the plan. *It was always two north/westbound tracks which merged, but now merge further east. Have a look at this diagram:http://tinyurl.com/42v2d4 The red bit is the new dive under. The yellow bit is the existing flyover. Ignore the red cross. By where it says DLT 1 there's some hatching on a section of the eastbound track, which is the bit to be demolished. Below the hatching are the two westbound tracks. One of these will be used temporarily to get eastbound trains from the flyover to West India Quay. And that's why they've made the two westbound tracks merge before they get to this area. U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London Will the diveunder mean that trains from Bank won't be able to access the centre platform at Canary Whard to reverse? *Do any bank services terminate at Canary Wharf at the moment, or is it just trains from Stratford?- Apparently they do at weekends (but I've never noticed, probably because it's so long since any normal weekend pattern has actually run). http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...-Timetable.pdf |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May, 13:12, brixtonite wrote:
Will the diveunder mean that trains from Bank won't be able to access the centre platform at Canary Whard to reverse? No idea. But they'll be coming from the east side rather than the middle, and I don't think there'll be a non-conflicting route to the middle platform and back out. It'd be much better to send them south and have the trains from Poplar direction use the middle platform. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May, 14:35, Mr Thant
wrote: On 27 May, 13:12, brixtonite wrote: Will the diveunder mean that trains from Bank won't be able to access the centre platform at Canary Whard to reverse? No idea. But they'll be coming from the east side rather than the middle, and I don't think there'll be a non-conflicting route to the middle platform and back out. It'd be much better to send them south and have the trains from Poplar direction use the middle platform. I don't think there's currently any route from the most eastern platform at West India Quay to the middle platform at Canary Wharf. But is there any reason why the current track from Westferry to West India couldn't be left in place for emergencies and quiet times? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May, 16:25, MIG wrote:
But is there any reason why the current track from Westferry to West India couldn't be left in place for emergencies and quiet times? 1. There isn't a current track from Westferry to West India Quay (apart from the flyover) 2. At time of writing, there isn't a current track from West India Quay to Westferry of any kind (apart from going the wrong way over the flyover). 3. The flyover and dive-under route avoiding West India Quay will only be used at peak times. 4. It turns out I was completely wrong about the interim state. They're going to turn Westferry Junction into a flat junction and demolish the flyover, exactly as you described. Environmental statement: http://194.201.98.213/WAM/doc/Other-...df&pageCount=1 Non-technical summary: http://194.201.98.213/WAM/doc/Other-...df&pageCount=1 (both have before/after track diagrams) U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 27, 11:33*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 27 May, 16:25, MIG wrote: But is there any reason why the current track from Westferry to West India couldn't be left in place for emergencies and quiet times? 1. There isn't a current track from Westferry to West India Quay (apart from the flyover) 2. At time of writing, there isn't a current track from West India Quay to Westferry of any kind (apart from going the wrong way over the flyover). Ah well. If they can describe a derailment as a broken down train, I spose they can describe a viaduct gone as overrunning engineering works ... 3. The flyover and dive-under route avoiding West India Quay will only be used at peak times. Ah right. That makes sense. 4. It turns out I was completely wrong about the interim state. They're going to turn Westferry Junction into a flat junction and demolish the flyover, exactly as you described. Ah right, but the flat junction is only used when the flyunder isn't used, ie at quieter times, or that would have been odd (moving the conflict from one place to another). But the diagram looks like I'm wrong about demolishing the flyover and that the peak southbound trains will go over the flyover and then under the flyunder. If what you said was wrong, it was only about the other route being interim. Or maybe it will be a different flyover. I am not clear on what's being lowered; presumably the current eastern end of the flyover so it can go under instead of heading for West India Quay. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 May, 00:19, MIG wrote:
On May 27, 11:33*pm, Mr Thant wrote: On 27 May, 16:25, MIG wrote: But is there any reason why the current track from Westferry to West India couldn't be left in place for emergencies and quiet times? 1. There isn't a current track from Westferry to West India Quay (apart from the flyover) 2. At time of writing, there isn't a current track from West India Quay to Westferry of any kind (apart from going the wrong way over the flyover). Ah well. *If they can describe a derailment as a broken down train, I spose they can describe a viaduct gone as overrunning engineering works ... 3. The flyover and dive-under route avoiding West India Quay will only be used at peak times. Ah right. *That makes sense. 4. It turns out I was completely wrong about the interim state. They're going to turn Westferry Junction into a flat junction and demolish the flyover, exactly as you described. Ah right, but the flat junction is only used when the flyunder isn't used, ie at quieter times, or that would have been odd (moving the conflict from one place to another). But the diagram looks like I'm wrong about demolishing the flyover and that the peak southbound trains will go over the flyover and then under the flyunder. *If what you said was wrong, it was only about the other route being interim. Or maybe it will be a different flyover. *I am not clear on what's being lowered; presumably the current eastern end of the flyover so it can go under instead of heading for West India Quay. The new flat junction splitting between Poplar and the West Curve seems to be in place, but not all the (will be two-way) track is in place yet between there and West India Quay. The flyover to West India Quay is still there, but out of use. Both outer platforms at West India Quay are boarded up and out of use. The track has been removed from the outer southbound platform at West India Quay, and the single-track viaduct leading to that platform from Poplar has had a section demolished. So I am guessing that, from next week, the new flat junction will become the route to and from West India Quay from and to Westferry, while work proceeds on diverting the track from the flyover to the flyunder, which is yet to be built. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stratford Regional-Stratford Intl on DLR | London Transport | |||
Stratford - that DLR bridge | London Transport | |||
Deptford Railway Station redevelopment | London Transport | |||
Stratford Eurostar station. | London Transport | |||
[OT] Fire in docklands or deptford? | London Transport |