Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 18, 3:29 pm, Steve Fitzgerald ] wrote:
You cannot carry on empty in a single track tunnel with a defective radio unless a second person is also with the train operator or the OPO alarm still transmits. That is the rule, sure. Is there a reason why that is the rule (given that the publicly stated reason for gibberingly paranoid radio failure "no trains anywhere" rules is passenger protection)? If so, what is the reason? [...] Is it right to send a train with possibly over 1000 out with no way of contacting someone should there be a delay to the service, then maybe requiring the train to be held or diverted, or a passenger alarm is operated and requires further assistance, or a one under requiring traction current off? Quite possibly not, but I was specifically referring to the ban on running *empty* trains on OPO when Connect is down. There is no ban. You may have missed the bit that said 'unless a second person is also with the train operator or the OPO alarm still works' which is what they do. Not missed, perhaps misinterpreted - I'd assumed that if Connect was down then the OPO alarm would most likely also be down. If not, then it's less of an issue. But I still don't quite understand why these precautions (ie no empty, single-manned trains if the Connect radio and the OPO alarm aren't working) are necessary, given that the safety issues with OPO compared to double-manning are passenger-related rather than train-related. We still run OOS when the radio fails until we get back into a section where it's working (or outside and you can use the Airwave radios we keep, if they're available) and re-enter service. If the whole system's down, it's hardly worthwhile running a fleet of empty trains about though. Well, clearly - but if it allows trains to operate a full above-ground passenger service (either reversing underground or running through as normal), rather than cutting it back to run solely between reversing points, it's probably a better option. After all, the drivers and trains are already paid for... -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathrow Connect - can't connect !! | London Transport | |||
Why can't LU cope with a signal failure? | London Transport | |||
Tube power failure at 18:15 on 17 May | London Transport | |||
Oyster Cards on buses - 50% failure rate? | London Transport | |||
Oystercard Failure | London Transport |