London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/810-britains-crap-roads-answers-wanted.html)

derek November 6th 03 07:20 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:42:40 -0000, "iantheengineer"
wrote:


Not everything works on the same principles are you so stupid??? Water flows
under gravity does that mean rock will too???


Certainly does as anyone who has studied civil engineering *ought*
*to* *know*. ;-)


There are some examples in Professor James Edward Gordon's books, (The
New Science of Strong Materials or Why You Don't Fall Through the
Floor, "Structures" was another one ), and there plenty for all to see
around here where stone walls have deflected in areas of mining
subsidence, The stones have bent over 50-100 years where the ground
has subsided beneath them. There are also many examples in the
medieval cathedrals you just need to look out for them.

According to Steve yes, so
when we build culverts for rocks we need to design them the same as for
water??!???


You don't need to rush!

DG

derek November 6th 03 07:59 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:09:11 -0000, "iantheengineer"
wrote:



Lets face it Derek, you will never get your arse out of your car until the
carbon monoxide from the polluted atmosphere leaks into it and we all die a
horrible death.


There's no CO from modern cars. People have tried to commit suicide by
piping the exhaust back into the passenger compartment and
persistently failed to die, that's why Dr What'sisface used those
drugs. They've become the fav. method since car exhaust no longer
works.


What business are you in needing all these tools?


I repair and install X-ray and Nuclear Counting/Imaging equipment in
Hospitals and Research labs.

Do you only travel for business?


My employment supports my family, and involves travelling. This week
Leeds,Exeter, Torquay, Dudley Leeds. Last week, Leeds, Edinburgh
Aberdeen, Leeds.

o you never travel for other reasons???


Yes, I go on holiday. 4 out of the last 5 years I've taken the car to
the continent. I've driven to Amsterdam, Berlin, Prague, Venice,
Florence, Rome, Naples, Amalfi, Vienna, Budapest, and all points in
between.

This last year the introduction of the Euro has caused a lot of
inflation on the continent making 2 rooms x 25 nights too expensive so
I went on a cruise and did Copenhagen, Vilnius, St. Petersburg,
Helsinki, Gothland, Warnemunde, (Old East) Germany, Stokholm, and
Aarhus in one trip.

No
amount of fact figures, studies will ever change your mind as you, and many
others in this NG only believe what they want to believe so that they can
sleep soundly at night.


??

In answer to your question about who does the maintenance on your product
well what can I say. You sold the product to them to inflate your pockets.


??

If you couldnt have provided it someone else would have in the locality or
they would have managed with what they had got perviously.


I can tell you, you wouldn't have wanted a child of yours to endure
the invasive proceadures that were routine before digital X-ray became
available. Eg, get a child, strap it to a tilting table, drill a small
hole in it's skull, inserta ;little plastic pipe, inject air as
contrast media, turn child upside down on tilting table and fire X-ray
shots at 2 per second as the bubbles make their way up the spinal
column.

As for the roadworks it obviously depends upon the length of works and the
type of works. When you next go past try opening your eyes and assessing
what work is being carried out. Obviously if you are patching its a quick
job, if you are relaying then it is a much bigger task, if you are fittimg
safety fencing / lighting or drainage then it takes even longer. Surely in
whatever it is that you do, some jobs take longer than others.


Just as I thought 2 hours is bull****.

For your sort of work it isnt realistic to expect you to use public
transport, but there are many other jobs that use cars, where PT could be
used. Most office workers commute to a city with a briefcase. If they werent
on the road then you would have less congestion.



I think you would be better employed mounting a tirade about:

1) Long distance commuting. Too many people are commuting 100 - 150
miles. On the railway it's by and large too expensive, on the buses
it's laughable! On the roads this means they are still travelling at
8-9 PM. But they don't do it for fun, society has pressed them into
that mould.

2) Short distance commuting at rush hour, just disincentivise it, make
these people pay the real cost of having vehicles and infrastructure
stood around all day (Like motorists do) just to be used for the rush
hour commute.

But outside these distortions the transport systems should be able to
meet the demand.

DG

Nick Finnigan November 7th 03 08:00 AM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 
"Ian Edwards" wrote in message
...
iantheengineer wrote:

How many cars does it take to move 72 people, at say 5 seats per car 15,
okay and what area does a car take up 5.75m by 2.5m roughly so 14.4m2 times
15 = 216m2, and what area does a double decker take 12.9m long by 2.5m =
32.25m2, hmm I need say no more.


Very good. Now get the bus to go in 15 different directions at the same
time. :-)


The bus is going in 15 different directions at the same time.
If it had a non-zero speed, it would need more than 12.9m x 2.5m





Stephen Cragg November 7th 03 10:32 AM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"derek" wrote in message
...

There's no CO from modern cars. People have tried to commit suicide by
piping the exhaust back into the passenger compartment and
persistently failed to die, that's why Dr What'sisface used those
drugs. They've become the fav. method since car exhaust no longer
works.

OK, it's pedantic, but modern cars do emit CO. A lot less than older cars,
but they still produce it nonetheless.

See

http://www.naei.org.uk/other/vehicle_emissions_v8.xls





derek November 7th 03 11:21 AM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:32:41 -0000, "Stephen Cragg"
wrote:


"derek" wrote in message
.. .

There's no CO from modern cars. People have tried to commit suicide by
piping the exhaust back into the passenger compartment and
persistently failed to die, that's why Dr What'sisface used those
drugs. They've become the fav. method since car exhaust no longer
works.

OK, it's pedantic,


Indeed it is, and not pertinent to this discussion. It would appear
that emissions have been reduced by a factor of about 40 fold.

We all know nothing is perfect.

but modern cars do emit CO. A lot less than older cars,
but they still produce it nonetheless.

See

http://www.naei.org.uk/other/vehicle_emissions_v8.xls




DG

iantheengineer November 7th 03 09:23 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"Ian Edwards" wrote in message
...
iantheengineer wrote:

How many cars does it take to move 72 people, at say 5 seats per car 15,
okay and what area does a car take up 5.75m by 2.5m roughly so 14.4m2

times
15 = 216m2, and what area does a double decker take 12.9m long by 2.5m =
32.25m2, hmm I need say no more.


Very good. Now get the bus to go in 15 different directions at the same
time. :-)

--
Ian Edwards



It doesnt need to for most of the commute



iantheengineer November 7th 03 09:26 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"Nick Finnigan" wrote in message
...
"iantheengineer" wrote in message
...

"Nick Finnigan" wrote in message
...
"iantheengineer" wrote in message
...

To continue to build roads will continue the problem. The answer is

puvblic
transport, but public transport cannot cater for all journeys and

therefore
over time journeys will need to become more corridored. For example

go
into
any city during the am peak and the tidality of the flow is there to

be
seen. IF we were to get all of the people from their cars onto

public
transport, or even better living nearer to the workplace, the

congestion
would be far less.

cars. Without cars on the urban road network public transport would

be
faster and more reliable.

How fast would urban public transport be with no cars
on the road? (and no vans, cycles, taxis etc. if that helps).


Is this a question, is it not obvious enough.

It will be exactly the travel time + the stops for pick up/drop off,

without
any delay occurring due to congestion,


And what will the travel speed be, and who long will
each stop take, and how frequently will the stops occur?
Or, alternatively, how fast would a typical journey be?




Well this depends upon the usage the frequency of buses, the congestion
levels. The reason for the introduction of bus lanes at intersections was to
advance the bus to the front of the queues thus gaining back on the journey
speed to make up for stops.



iantheengineer November 7th 03 09:27 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"Clive" wrote in message
...
In message , Chris Jones
writes
Your view is certainly not shared by me, yes she may have buiilt roads,
but look at what happens road building leads to more traffic, this
has been researched.

This is almost the same argument put forward by one of the landed gentry
on seeing the railways. "Oh no, it'll just encourage the working class
to travel." It's along the lines of, "I'm entitled to travel, but
you've got to stay put.
--
Clive


We cant travel if the rate of increase in traffic continues



iantheengineer November 7th 03 09:29 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"JNugent" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Clive wrote:


iantheengineer writes:


Are we getting there...do I need to draw a picture for you.


So it's O.K. for you to travel, but not others, or are you going
to lead by example and stay within walking distance of your home
all of your life?


It's completely obvious that's not what he means. It's true that
people use their cars too much.


What does "too much" mean?

And who gets to decide what constitutes "too much"?

Me? Or you?

If it's you, why not me?

It's ridiculous that people think
it's ok to commute 50 or 100 or whatever miles to work each day in a
car with only one person in it.


Why (apart from that being your opinion, I mean)?

Obviously people have to get to
places some distance away from their home but there's no need for
them to be so ridiculously far away just so some rich **** can live
in a quiet little village.


I don't suppose anyone else knows what you mean by that either.

(and what a lovely turn of phrase you have)

It's also true that a new road doesn't just relieve congestion.


So if the M1 were closed, there would be no increase in congestion?

You can't have that one both ways, can you?

If you
build a new motorway the cars don't just magically appear on it, they
have to go over other roads to get there.


And *avoid* the ones they would have used in the absence of the new

route...
had you forgotten that bit?



To commute is to waste, in both time and resources, the more we reduce
commuting the easier it will be for the people who have to travel to get
around. But then again Mr Nugent I wouldnt expect you to change for anyone,
even the future of mankind.



iantheengineer November 7th 03 09:37 PM

Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted
 

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
...
iantheengineer wrote:

Not everything works on the same principles are you so stupid??? Water

flows
under gravity does that mean rock will too???


Well yes it does actually.

Avalanche.
Landslip.
Continental drift
Lava flow

These appear to be some concepts missing from your limited education.

[snip waffle]

Anyway Steve I think theres a village missing an idiot


Why not apply for the vacancy then numbnuts?

--
Having problems understanding usenet? Or do you simply need help but
are getting unhelpful answers? Subscribe to: uk.net.beginners for
friendly advice in a flame-free environment.


We could go on forever but suffice to say not all things work under the same
rules, yes perhaps rock was a poor example due to the issue of it being lava
when in a super heated stat, but to go by your theories we would only need
one mathematical formula to solve all of the worlds issues and this isnt the
case, ask any mathematician. I have pointed out the evidence which is
accepted by transport professionals the world over and still you doubt, well
fine I am not going to argue anymore wasting my time, suffice to say that
the construction of a new road is a complex issue with many far reaching
implications. It facilitates movement, but by that very facilitation it can
make transport more attractive and increases the usage, which impacts upon
other areas of the network. This is why whenever new roads are built traffic
models have to be built that simulate traffic flow and we as engineers have
to examine the impacts and mitigate against them to prevent gridlock within
limited budgets.




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk