Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
On May 18, 6:09*pm, 1506 wrote:
Let me be clear that obtrusively photographing someone else’s child is entirely unacceptable. *It is a sad day when the courts have to deal with a matter this trivial. *The photographer should have known better. In the wider context, photography in the streets has been acceptable for decades. *Indeed it is a normal activity for tourists. I dislike the notion that somehow that has ceased to be the case. Does anyone know the facts of this case? It seems highly unlikely that a straightforward photo of the child would result in a court appearance even if the parents did get upset. I have no knowledge of this case but, for example, if a photographer lowered his camera to obtain a shot up the childs skirt, would that affect the situation. I think so, others may differ. George |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
"furnessvale" wrote in message ... On May 18, 6:09 pm, 1506 wrote: Let me be clear that obtrusively photographing someone else’s child is entirely unacceptable. It is a sad day when the courts have to deal with a matter this trivial. The photographer should have known better. In the wider context, photography in the streets has been acceptable for decades. Indeed it is a normal activity for tourists. I dislike the notion that somehow that has ceased to be the case. Does anyone know the facts of this case? It seems highly unlikely that a straightforward photo of the child would result in a court appearance even if the parents did get upset. I have no knowledge of this case but, for example, if a photographer lowered his camera to obtain a shot up the childs skirt, would that affect the situation. I think so, others may differ. George ------------------------------------- http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...ws_282766.html MB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
"MB" wrote in message . net... "furnessvale" wrote in message ... On May 18, 6:09 pm, 1506 wrote: Let me be clear that obtrusively photographing someone else’s child is entirely unacceptable. It is a sad day when the courts have to deal with a matter this trivial. The photographer should have known better. In the wider context, photography in the streets has been acceptable for decades. Indeed it is a normal activity for tourists. I dislike the notion that somehow that has ceased to be the case. Does anyone know the facts of this case? It seems highly unlikely that a straightforward photo of the child would result in a court appearance even if the parents did get upset. I have no knowledge of this case but, for example, if a photographer lowered his camera to obtain a shot up the childs skirt, would that affect the situation. I think so, others may differ. George ------------------------------------- http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...ws_282766.html MB This is a very strange reply to the question "Asked whether police confiscated the photographer's camera, the BTP spokesman told us: 'As is standard police procedure, items would have been removed from him prior to him being placed into a cell. They would have been securely stored and then returned to him.' " You would think a simple "Yes" or "No" would be sufficient. MB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
In message t
"MB" wrote: "MB" wrote in message . net... "furnessvale" wrote in message ... On May 18, 6:09 pm, 1506 wrote: Let me be clear that obtrusively photographing someone else’s child is entirely unacceptable. It is a sad day when the courts have to deal with a matter this trivial. The photographer should have known better. In the wider context, photography in the streets has been acceptable for decades. Indeed it is a normal activity for tourists. I dislike the notion that somehow that has ceased to be the case. Does anyone know the facts of this case? It seems highly unlikely that a straightforward photo of the child would result in a court appearance even if the parents did get upset. I have no knowledge of this case but, for example, if a photographer lowered his camera to obtain a shot up the childs skirt, would that affect the situation. I think so, others may differ. George ------------------------------------- http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...ws_282766.html MB This is a very strange reply to the question "Asked whether police confiscated the photographer's camera, the BTP spokesman told us: 'As is standard police procedure, items would have been removed from him prior to him being placed into a cell. They would have been securely stored and then returned to him.' " You would think a simple "Yes" or "No" would be sufficient. Neither would be aacurate, his camera wasn't confiscated but to say No would be misleading as it was taken away from him, along with his other possesions. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
MB wrote on Tue, 19 May 2009 12:19:36 +0100:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/ Photographers_Tube_photo_case_thrown_out_update_ne ws_282766.html At least he wasn't "attacked by bandits with machetes"! -- Alex (imagining people keeping their .sigs to four lines) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Photography diplomatic incident
In uk.transport.london Alex Potter wrote:
At least he wasn't "attacked by bandits with machetes"! The Jubilee Line isn't /that/ bad! ;-) Theo |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Photography diplomatic incident | London Transport | |||
This Photography Lark is Getting Ridiculous | London Transport | |||
Idea (LU photography permits) | London Transport | |||
Photography underground | London Transport | |||
Photography on LU | London Transport |