"Andrew Heenan" wrote in message


In this case, it isn't political correctness, it's safety. But who
cares when there's a chance to attack the unions, eh?

But surely, in this case, the union is striking in defence of a member
who compromised safety, first by making a dangerous mistake, and then by
not taking the prescribed recovery action. So, presumably, the union is
*against* passenger safety if that comes before an unsafe member's job?
Perhaps Brother Crow should be prosecuted on 'elf 'n safety grounds?