![]() |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear ends round our corners for the final time.
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:01:41 +0100
Bruce wrote: Of course, the greater length, articulation and the rear section's self-steering system make it different, but those differences are They don't self steer, they follow a curve. Simple geometry which even cyclists could understand if they bothered to try. Also the cut in on a bendy bus rear section going around a corner is a shed load less than on an HGV. B2003 |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
On 28 July, 13:24, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On Jul 28, 1:15*pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: Maybe the bendy routes in London should have been introduced as new routes constrained to follow the wider roads, instead of taking over existing routes like the 73 and expecting bendies to turn from Stoke Newington Church St to Albion Road without causing problems. Yes, that would have been a good idea. I think that getting rid of them all just because they are used badly is every bot as foolish as introducing them into routes where they cause problems. I have commuted daily by bus on a bendy route and they have approximately zero seats. I think that this may have figured into the calculation to phase them out. Nothing at all to do with them being Ken's busses and not Boris' I am sure. I think that a key reason that they are less pleasant for cyclists is that the larger size of them results in there being an increased frequency of ill-judged attempted overtakes (where for example the driver drives as if the bus had zero length) and fewer options are left for the cyclist when the bus driver offers imminent death. Bizarrely, driving a bus in a manner contrary to the recommendations of the highway code does not seem to be considered careless or dangerous unless someone is dead. The aircraft industry and the HSE have recognised for decades that routine unsafe operation results in routine deaths, with a bit of luck the HSE will turn their attention further towards road deaths and injuries while "at work" in the near future. |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rearends round our corners for the final time.
On 28 July, 14:32, "Ian F." wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message ... Not if your mind is rigidly set against the bendy bus, and you are simply looking for excuses to get rid of it. *;-) People who like BoJo hate the bendy bus. People who hate BoJo like the bendy bus. Simples. Ian Anyone who believes that would have to be. |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
On Jul 28, 2:52*pm, wrote:
Obviously the buses fault, nothing to do with the driver. Must be something psychotic about the bendy part of it. So you can't see why an 18m long vehicle doing this in front of you is more of a problem than a 9m long vehicle? Really? In this case the bus pulled onto the roundabout and immediately had to stop for a traffic light, blocking my route to the exit. A standard length bus would simply not have been a problem. See above: your base premise is in error. *Do you cycle much in central London? Why would I? I'm not an idiot. There are these things known as buses and tubes. If you want to use a slower and more expensive mode (and take part in the great virus incubation experiment while you do so) then that is your choice :-) I'm not the only cyclist to find bendy buses to be disproportionately problematic. If you can deal with a large bus then you can't deal with HGVs either so therefor you should leave your bike at home, accept you're not competant on the road and stop whining. Once again, you are wrong. I can and do deal with goods vehicles of all sizes, but the largest artics are not normally seen in the centre of London during commuting time, and they also have quite different characteristics - the tail of a bendy bus moves in *much* faster than the trailer of an artic. Bendy buses are far and away the longest vehicles and also the most common long vehicles you will encounter in central London during peak hours. The original comment was: "Sharon Grant, Chair, London TravelWatch said: "We have yet to hear a credible reason for scrapping bendy buses..." I think there are credible reasons for removing them from some routes. I am not the only one to think this. Which indicates to me that Sharon Grant is either deliberately ignoring some concerns, or perhaps meant to imply "altogether" in her sentence, in which case I'd agree that scrapping them altogether is probably unnecessary as long as you get them out of the places where they simply don't fit properly. The great joy of London is that it's a human-scale city, you can walk from St Paul's the the National Gallery, wander round for a couple of hours then walk on to the West End for a show. Bendy buses are out of scale, designed for a Continental model which Wren, Hooke and others failed to have applied to London after the fire. -- Guy |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT), bod43
wrote: I think that a key reason that they are less pleasant for cyclists is that the larger size of them results in there being an increased frequency of ill-judged attempted overtakes (where for example the driver drives as if the bus had zero length) and fewer options are left for the cyclist when the bus driver offers imminent death. Bizarrely, driving a bus in a manner contrary to the recommendations of the highway code does not seem to be considered careless or dangerous unless someone is dead. The aircraft industry and the HSE have recognised for decades that routine unsafe operation results in routine deaths, with a bit of luck the HSE will turn their attention further towards road deaths and injuries while "at work" in the near future. Complete, over-emotive nonsense. The statistics will show that bendy buses have an excellent safety record. If the figures really showed that they were unsafe, they would have been gone long ago. What few problems there are - and let's be in no doubt, they are few - seem to be a direct result of other road users (car and lorry drivers, cyclists and pedestrians) failing to take any account of the size of the bus. Treating it as though it was smaller, then complaining bitterly because it isn't, displays the head-in-the-sand attitide that is at the root of opposition to these very fine vehicles. |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
|
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rearends round our corners for the final time.
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Jul 28, 11:10 am, wrote: Tell me , are british commuter cyclists just particularly incompetant and/or stupid compared to european ones who've been living with bendy buses for years or are you all - what most people suspect is the case - nothing but a bunch of tedious whingers? I suggest you try riding a bike round some European city centres some time. The bus routes in major European cities where bendy buses are common typically run along broad boulevards which are straight or have wide, sweeping bends. What, like the Uxbridge Road, where the 207 bendies will shortly (well, 2011) be replaced by a great many slow-loading single door entry double deckers like we used to have? RMLs having departed in 1987, it's back to the Eighties with Boris, then. *sigh* It's not the interior or the fares or the roads, it's the bendy bit that people object to, however much they dress it up. There's probably a pill you can take. Tom |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear ends round our corners for the final time.
|
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
"Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: So you can't see why an 18m long vehicle doing this in front of you is more of a problem than a 9m long vehicle? Really? In this case the bus pulled onto the roundabout and immediately had to stop for a traffic light, blocking my route to the exit. A standard length bus would simply not have been a problem. But you can see how long the bus is, why don't you take account of that? Much as though you would probably prefer otherwise, in a head to head with a bus a cyclist isn't going to win so why not just accept that fact and stop complaining when buses get in your way. You can scoot around most obstacles, buses can't. Why would I? I'm not an idiot. There are these things known as buses and tubes. If you want to use a slower and more expensive mode (and take part in the great virus incubation experiment while you do so) then that is your choice :-) OTOH theres little chance of me being run over. characteristics - the tail of a bendy bus moves in *much* faster than the trailer of an artic. Bendy buses are far and away the longest So what? When you encounter a long vehicle for the first time I can understand your concern , but since you deal with them every day whats the problem? If you can't handle the vehicles on the road don't go on it. I think there are credible reasons for removing them from some routes. I am not the only one to think this. Which indicates to me Some routes yes, where they simply don't fit. But not to get rid of them altogether. B2003 |
These writhing whales of the road have swung their hefty rear
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: Do you cycle much in central London? I'm not the only cyclist to find bendy buses to be disproportionately problematic. I'm sure I'm not the only London road user to find cyclists to be disproportionately problematic. It is difficult to imagine a group of road users who are more anti-social, showing, as so many do, scant regard for the Highway Code and complete contempt for other road users, especially pedestrians. I'd be veryr interested to hear why you don't consider cabbies to be road users. tom -- I had no idea it was going to end in such tragedy |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk