Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning
(at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nicholas F Hodder" wrote the following in:
Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning (at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. I caught a Central line train at Liverpool Street this morning. I had to wait for three to go past before there was one with any space for extra passengers to get on, and hardly any passengers were getting off. I'd think that maybe the reason trains weren't stopping there was because it was a bit of a waste of time. -- message by Robin May, consumer of liquids Hello. I'm one of those "roaring fascists of the left wing". Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:54:33 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder"
wrote: Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning (at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. I think that a number of routes are under pressure because of the Northern Line problems and the Vic Line was seriously disrupted at Oxford Circus yesterday. Liverpool St was closed temporarily to people entering it. The platforms would be full and believe me when platforms get completely full the last thing you want is more people trying to push onto them while others are trying to get off. The risks are - people may fall off the platform or be pushed / fall under a train. Also people may just be crushed by the crowd and small children may get trampled. Finally if the congestion became too severe you get people blocked back to the escalators thus preventing people from leaving them thus resulting in a pile up of people on the escalator. Therefore the staff would stop people entering the station until trains had cleared the backlog and then people would be allowed back in in a controlled fashion. Happens every single day at Victoria because it is just too small for the huge volumes of people using the station. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message
... On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:54:33 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder" wrote: Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning (at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. I think that a number of routes are under pressure because of the Northern Line problems and the Vic Line was seriously disrupted at Oxford Circus yesterday. Liverpool St was closed temporarily to people entering it. The platforms would be full and believe me when platforms get completely full the last thing you want is more people trying to push onto them while others are trying to get off. How can others get off if the trains don't stop to let anyone get off? The risks are - people may fall off the platform or be pushed / fall under a train. Also people may just be crushed by the crowd and small children may get trampled. Finally if the congestion became too severe you get people blocked back to the escalators thus preventing people from leaving them thus resulting in a pile up of people on the escalator. Therefore the staff would stop people entering the station until trains had cleared the backlog and then people would be allowed back in in a How can the trains clear the backlog if they are going through the station without stopping? controlled fashion. Happens every single day at Victoria because it is just too small for the huge volumes of people using the station. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nicholas F Hodder wrote:
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:54:33 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder" wrote: Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning (at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. I think that a number of routes are under pressure because of the Northern Line problems and the Vic Line was seriously disrupted at Oxford Circus yesterday. Liverpool St was closed temporarily to people entering it. The platforms would be full and believe me when platforms get completely full the last thing you want is more people trying to push onto them while others are trying to get off. How can others get off if the trains don't stop to let anyone get off? They *were* stopping, probably. Did someone tell you they weren't, or did you infer that (incorrectly) from the fact that the station was closed to people entering it? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
... Nicholas F Hodder wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:54:33 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder" wrote: Can anyone explain why Liverpool Street tube station was closed this morning (at least for westbound Central Line trains)? They said it was because of overcrowding, but when I asked Tube staff where the overcrowding was, they said it was on the Central Line platforms. If trains don't stop at the platform, how will this ease overcrowding? Surely it makes things worse. I think that a number of routes are under pressure because of the Northern Line problems and the Vic Line was seriously disrupted at Oxford Circus yesterday. Liverpool St was closed temporarily to people entering it. The platforms would be full and believe me when platforms get completely full the last thing you want is more people trying to push onto them while others are trying to get off. How can others get off if the trains don't stop to let anyone get off? They *were* stopping, probably. Did someone tell you they weren't, or did you infer that (incorrectly) from the fact that the station was closed to people entering it? Announcements at Bethnal Green, both by station staff and several train drivers, stated clearly that trains were not stopping at Liverpool Street because of "overcrowding". I had to wait until the 4th or 5th train before there was space for me to get on, and just before my train got to Liverpool Street, the driver announced that the train would be stopping at Liverpool Street after all, as the station had reopened. When I got out at Liverpool Street, I asked some Tube staff at surface level where the overcrowding had been that had necessitated the station's "closure", and he replied that it was on the Central Line platforms. I do not understand how not letting trains stop will ease existing overcrowding on the platforms, hence the reason for my original question. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:43:47 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder"
wrote: [big snip] How can the trains clear the backlog if they are going through the station without stopping? of course the trains were stopping. They just weren't letting anyone *into* the station. That way the queue on the platform is progressively cleared. The station was only closed for 6 minutes according to the report that I read. HTH -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:43:47 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder" wrote: [big snip] How can the trains clear the backlog if they are going through the station without stopping? of course the trains were stopping. They just weren't letting anyone *into* the station. That way the queue on the platform is progressively cleared. The station was only closed for 6 minutes according to the report that I read. Why were station staff at Bethnal Green and train drivers announcing specifically that westbound trains were not be stopping at Liverpool Street then? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Nicholas F
Hodder writes Why were station staff at Bethnal Green and train drivers announcing specifically that westbound trains were not be stopping at Liverpool Street then? For the same reason staff at Waterloo deny that virtually every train that departs will stop at Clapham Common. To stop people getting on!! -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote in
: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:43:47 +0100, "Nicholas F Hodder" wrote: [big snip] How can the trains clear the backlog if they are going through the station without stopping? of course the trains were stopping. They just weren't letting anyone *into* the station. That way the queue on the platform is progressively cleared. The station was only closed for 6 minutes according to the report that I read. Having just come across this thread after being away from usenet for a couple of weeks, I can say with 100% certainty that westbound Central Line trains were *not* stopping at Liverpool Street that morning. I know this, because I was on one of those trains. At Bethnal Green the driver came on the PA to say that he apologised for the short notice but he'd only just been informed that he wasn't to stop at Liverpool Street due to overcrowding. When we got into Liverpool Street station the train did come to a halt for about 30-45 seconds, but the doors weren't opened. The platform was rather full, although not ridiculously so, and passengers already on the train could quite clearly hear the station's recorded announcement being repeated, telling passengers to vacate the station immediately due to an emergency. Despite this, most people were still standing on the platform, waiting (in vain) for the doors of the train I was on to open. Dunno what would have happened if there had been a real emergency. Iain -- "I go online sometimes but everyone's spelling is really bad. It's depressing." --Tara, Buffy 5x15 "I Was Made To Love You" |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best way on tube from Liverpool Street to Hatton Cross | London Transport | |||
Liverpool Street - Central Line Sidings | London Transport | |||
Trains to Moorgate now go via Liverpool Street | London Transport | |||
Bus Liverpool street (?) Bayswater | London Transport | |||
Central Line @ Liverpool St. This Morning. | London Transport |