Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:25:17AM -0700, MIG wrote:
The claimed superior capacity of a bendy over a double decker has always been hard to believe though. Now I'm as anti-bendy as they come, but *I* believe that they have a greater capacity. If a bendy and a normal bus are "crush loaded" (a term that gives away that passenger comfort is of no consequence) then the bendy can carry more victims. The important bit, to me, is the number of seats - ie, the number of people that can be carried in a civilised manner, with a semblance of comfort. There, normal buses win every time due to having more seats on each vehicle *and* operating at a higher frequency so you don't have to wait so long at the bus stop. But like I said, it's obvious that passenger comfort doesn't matter. -- David Cantrell | A machine for turning tea into grumpiness engineer: n. one who, regardless of how much effort he puts in to a job, will never satisfy either the suits or the scientists |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Harlington's Fate is Sealed - Third Runway only achieves 45% required capacity | London Transport | |||
Tramlink needs Bustitution to meet capacity requirements - crazy | London Transport | |||
DLR Capacity Enhancement Phase 2: North & East Routes | London Transport | |||
LURS meeting tonight: Docklands Light Railway Capacity Enhancement | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport |