Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Tolley wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 14:11:42 on Sun, 8 Aug 2010, CJB remarked: TfL explained that it could not be aware of any over-charging until the issue was reported by a passenger. Apart, of course, from looking for cards where there were two top-up [bank charges] on the same day. Yes - some passengers will do that, but that doesn't actually matter. What you are looking for is top-ups where there were two debits but only one amount of credit added. Not holding an Oyster card, I wouldn't know, but in many cases the financial part of e-transactions is handled separately for security reasons. If that is the case here, then how would TfL know in detail TfL would need to reconcile payments taken against the sale. Their finance department would be able to run reports from their bank for all card payments. I see no reason why each and every sale made via a machine generates a unique reference number which in turn is transmitted to the bank. From their they could pin-point any discrepancies between bank reports and sale reports from each machine. -- Phil Richards, London, UK 3,600+ railway photos since 1980 at: http://europeanrail.fotopic.net http://britishrail.fotopic.net |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster: still an unreliable rip-off | London Transport | |||
Anger at Oyster cards 'rip-off' as millions hit for not 'touching out' | London Transport | |||
Oyster - a £60 million a year rip-off | London Transport | |||
Southall - Zonal fare rip-off? | London Transport | |||
Microsoft's rip-off of Google Earth | London Transport |