Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Heightened Security & Photography
Railist wrote:
Last week I made the monumental mistake of taking photographs of Cockfosters Station, on my way home from work. I always take pictures of tube stations - the Piccadilly Line ones are just beautiful. Especially Southgate, but I digress. One of the station staff approached me and asked what I was doing and I told him. (I have spoken to him before about taking pictures and it was never a problem...) First things first - I should have asked permission as a courtesy. I totally accept that. In my defence it was spare of the moment with the light and shadows and I was in the last carriage, so didn't think about walking the length of the platform and back again. But yes, I should have asked permission. I thought that was the end of it. I apologised and explained that I thought it was fine because I recall seeing a sign (somewhere) asking people not to take flash photography, so I kind of thought that was a presumed permission. He then said that I was causing alarm amongst passengers and drivers - which was totally not the case. There were no passengers or drivers about at that time. And I actually don't want people in photographs of buildings. One of the cleaners exclaimed something in French to me but I didn't understand. But accept that she could have been alarmed. But then she alarmed me by not speaking in English but that's beside the point. He then got his supervisor who asked the same question, and said he understood that I wanted to take pictures of the architecture but I wasn't too photograph anything in the roof, due to "heightened security". Yet Cockfosters is without staff for several hours in the morning and evening - if security was so heightened should this not be addressed? Or was that a fib? SO I then decided to check the TfL website, where I discovered some fairly stringent rules about taking pictures, he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...aspx#section-2 TfL's website offers a "student/non professional users" £40 license fee, that takes about three weeks to be processed and "this permit is only a permit to film or photograph. It does not allow you to publish or broadcast your photographs or films anywhere externally, including on the internet..." Then I found this: https://custserv.tfl.gov.uk/icss_csi...ewTabtext=Tube Taking photographs on the Tube If you are just passing through, you shouldn't have a problem taking personal snaps, souvenir shots etc. although you must NOT use flash or lights on any of our platforms. However, if you want to spend more than 10-15 minutes at any one station videoing or taking photos, or if they are for professional use, you MUST have a permit. So, I was correct in the presumed permission - the pictures were not for professional use, and I was at the station for about 5 minutes. I suppose my point is that if you want to take pictures, take a print out of that webpage from TfL with you! And that if people mention security as a reason for anything, I instantly lose interest in what they are saying. It seems such an easy one-excuse-fits-all kind of answer. I think you were basically correct to do what you did, and I see no reason why you should have felt obliged to ask permission for five minutes of picture-taking. The LU guidelines are quite clear and reasonable and they should not need to be modified to suit the security paranoia of a particular member or members of LU staff. However, all TfL staff are required to be very aware of potential risks and one thing they are probably trained to look out for is people who behave in a manner that makes them stand out. So their response is perhaps understandable in that context. There is one grey area in the guidelines and that is the meaning of "for personal use". A court would have to decide precisely what that term meant, but it would normally exclude publication (except for editorial use). Once again, the term "publication" is not precisely defined anywhere, and would need to be decided on in court, but the term would normally include display on a web site or internet file-sharing. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Security alert at Bushey station needed 20 squad cars ? | London Transport | |||
New National Security Technology ignored that might have stopped the bombing | London Transport | |||
removing staff? What happens to security? | London Transport | |||
How do you enter your security answer on the Oyster Sales site? | London Transport | |||
Security of Oyster Cards | London Transport |