Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Basil Jet" wrote Wouldn't it be better and possibly profitable to extend all of the Crossrail Paddington terminators to North Pole, then on a new track to near Harlesden Station , then on the freight line up to Neasden where they could take over the entire Chiltern service (both Amersham and High Wycombe), allowing the line from Neasden to Marylebone including the Marylebone Station site to be sold off and also allowing the Met to terminate at Baker Street? Oh hang on, that would require the Chiltern Lines to be electrified... An early iteration of Crossrail was indeed to run it via the Acton Wells - Neasden Junction line and then the Chiltern Met Line, taking over the Chiltern Aylesbury via Amersham service as well as the Met Chiltern and Amersham service. The Met would have been left with Watford and Uxbridge. Cost benefit analysis showed that there was no adequate business case. Peter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circle Line up the spout again | London Transport | |||
Circle Line "closing" from 2009? | London Transport | |||
Circle Line train amber lights | London Transport | |||
Circle Line reliability | London Transport | |||
Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District? | London Transport |