Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Crossrail tunnelling to start shortly
On Apr 3, 10:56*pm, D DB 90001
wrote: On Tuesday, 3 April 2012 21:52:19 UTC+1, Bruce *wrote: Charles Ellson wrote: On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:08:49 +0100, Bruce wrote: Charles Ellson wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:37:38 -0700 (PDT), 77002 wrote: On Mar 18, 4:01*pm, D7666 wrote: On Mar 18, 12:44*pm, 77002 wrote: Partially by planning to build trains that have few seats and no toilets. This is the cost of involving TfL I suppose. *Why cannot Crossrail be run in a similar manner to Thameslink? I suggest if through route Thameslink did not already exist and/or the present trains on the route did not already exist, then it would be more Crossrail like; indeed, I suggest it would also be a more metro less main line operation, with slow all stations trains to SR ML and GN suburban destinations, without *old NSE *type network express workings. Indeed, if I planned TL from scratch, I'd never have linked it in with GN, but with the Met (and electrified GC suburban) at West Hampstead. Instead we have a supermarket where we should have junctions infrastructure, and three disjointed stations instead of one. West Hampstead is one of London's biggest, wasted, transportation opportunities. It's not conveniently near a seaport to get the people to Oz, is it ? Oh, very funny Charles. *;-) West Hampstead is one of those places where trainspotters pore over lines on maps and think "we must build an interchange station here, so people can change trains between all these converging lines". Given that the lines have all been in situ for more than a century, if there was any real demand for this interchange, don't you think someone would have done it by now? *The only evidence of any demand seems to come from trainspotters clutching their rail atlases. I used to work in the area. Those whose navigational abilities were limited to the map in the back of their diary (and there are IME still lots of them) might have agreed but that is not entirely their fault. In past times useful interchange would have been practically limited to those aware of the more exotic routings available with season tickets but that should no longer apply with current zoned ticketing. It is not the idea of interchange between the three stations which is wrong as much as the typically over-enthusiastic plans for achieving it. At a most basic level all that is needed is a properly-operating "out of station" interchange arrangement but that would be greatly helped if all the people capable of using the interchange were aware of it; the walking distances involved are less than many same-station interchanges in Central London. Rather than building one dirty great station, what is needed is improved pedestrian links between them where possible; if/when the NLL and LU/NR bridges at the two southern stations are replaced then there should be no excuse for not incorporating pedestrian routes at that time if not already done as e.g. a partial or complete footbridge/tunnel route from West Hampstead LU via West End Lane station to West Hampstead Midland. I agree that the grandiose solutions being proposed to solve this non-problem were ludicrous. *But there is one major obstacle to a full interchange, and that is the lack of Chiltern Line platforms. Not that Chiltern Railways would be interested. *The last thing Chiltern needs is another stop further extending journey times just to benefit a very small number of passengers. The abolition of the long-established failure by assorted parties to admit that LU are not the only railway operators in Greater London would also be a lot of help. I think a recognition that Chiltern's primary role does not include operating suburban services within London would help a lot more. IIRC Chiltern considered operating a Metro-style service, but the plans were dropped, presumeably because of the low-return on investment expected. Significant enhancements would be required in order to enable Chiltern to maintain a high-frequency metro service in addition to their relatively high-speed long distance services. I agree that a grandiose solution is not necessary, the fact is that West Hampstead (Overground)* and West Hampstead (Underground) are a fixed distance apart, and a tunnel/bridge will not reduce this distance. There have already been some enhancements to the walking route including traffic light crossings and better signage. If I remember correctly there were also concerns that the aforementioned bridge/tunnel could become a hub for crime because of its secluded nature and relatively low footfalls - it might actually be "safer" to keep the walking route to the road. Bearing all of that in mind, I do think that Chiltern and London Underground/Overground/Thameslink would benefit from an investment in Chiltern and Metropolitan line platforms. Not only would you enable journeys between the Chiltern line and Thameslink/Overground it would also ease pressures on Marylebone's Bakerloo Line station by enabling interchange with Metropolitan and Jubilee line services. Chiltern platforms at Finchley Road would have similar outcomes at lower costs, but not benefit from connections to Thameslink/Overground. There is no space for Chiltern and Metropolitan Platforms at West Hampstead. However, allowing Thameslink passengers easy access the West End (thru the Jubilee Line), and the orbital services provided by London Overground would be very worthwhile. It would certainly offer an alternative to the crowded Marylebone Road/Euston Road interchanges. Our self-righteous refugee from the 1960s havers on about demand. He seems blind to the fact that in his "golden age" the North London Line, et al was being run down. Look at the Overground today. Passenger convenience is improved as routes are improved or re-opened and new interchanges created. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail tunnelling complete | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling complete | London Transport | |||
Jubilee line tunnelling this weekend? | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling pictures | London Transport | |||
Crossrail tunnelling to start shortly | London Transport |