Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 May 2012 21:54:01 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:37:25 on Thu, 24 May 2012, Graham Nye remarked: (But younger people now might dispense with a TV and just watch programmes on a laptop.) My children are much more likely to "watch TV" by using BBC iPlayer, and the several similar sites for other channels, than having to sit in front of a conventional TV at exactly the right time. We have a PVR, but that needs setting in advance, and almost everything they might have recorded is available online for a week or more. On the other hand, they are quite likely to use a "TV" as the monitor on the PC, because that's what we happen to have a surplus of. The problem with this business model is what's also afflicting Facebook delivered onto smartphones. There is so much less opportunity to advertise to the users, that it's not clear where the long term funding is going to come from. Drifting OT here, but it was amusing yesterday, to see the mask slip at Facebook, when a FB exec jokingly said that they *really* needed people to click on ads, now they are expected to make a profit: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05...facebook_exec/ for my money, I agree with the commentators on the story, that FB will have to find a way to charge users - probably by introducing a "FB premium" account. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 09:02:46 on Fri, 25
May 2012, Jethro_uk remarked: FB will have to find a way to charge users - probably by introducing a "FB premium" account. They are already trialling a scheme where you have to pay to have your postings "highlighted", which could mission-creep very quickly into "so your postings are circulated at al1". -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.railway Jethro_uk twisted the electrons to say:
Drifting OT here, but it was amusing yesterday, to see the mask slip at Facebook, when a FB exec jokingly said that they *really* needed people to click on ads, now they are expected to make a profit: Well you know the "real reason" that Facebook went public? They couldn't understand the privacy options either ... -- These opinions might not even be mine ... Let alone connected with my employer ... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:39:53 on Fri, 25 May
2012, Alistair Gunn remarked: Well you know the "real reason" that Facebook went public? They couldn't understand the privacy options either ... A very old joke (well, in cyberspace terms). They might also be aware that their revenue model is in danger of imploding (because of the migration from PCs to mobile), so get out while you can. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rail strike is off - but not according to TfL weekend travel email | London Transport | |||
Oyster Extension Permits (OEPs) | London Transport | |||
Oyster travel cap (z2-6 ) if travel is within 2-6 but fare is via Z1(UPDATED !!!) | London Transport | |||
Oyster travel cap (z2-6 ) if travel is within 2-6 but fare is via Z1 | London Transport | |||
Idea (LU photography permits) | London Transport |