Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:49:45 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:26:15 on Wed, 17 Sep 2014, d remarked: If companies didn't contract stuff out, where would you be? And if the contract isn't clear about ownership of what you create they are crazy. So TfL owns the right to the MiFare system, smart card readers and contactless bank cards does it? Umm , no. So what is left - the gates and the backend software? They own whatever middleware and other technology has taken over a year more than even the most recent estimate to get running. It looks as if it *ought* to be simple, but clearly it's not. No doubt the (sub)contractor hired a load of know-nothing offshored bodyshoppers to do the donkey work and got exactly what they paid so little for. -- Spud |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 17/09/2014 14:29, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 13:59:27 on Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Mizter T remarked: So TfL owns the right to the MiFare system, smart card readers and contactless bank cards does it? Umm , no. So what is left - the gates and the and the backend software? They own whatever middleware and other technology has taken over a year more than even the most recent estimate to get running. It looks as if it *ought* to be simple, but clearly it's not. You think it's simple. OK, if you say so. I said it LOOKS as if it OUGHT to be simple sigh, but clearly it isn't. That's not the same as saying IT IS SIMPLE and that they've botched it. Right, I'll rephrase then... You think it looks like it ought to be simple. OK, if you say so... |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:13:19 on Wed, 17 Sep
2014, Mizter T remarked: So TfL owns the right to the MiFare system, smart card readers and contactless bank cards does it? Umm , no. So what is left - the gates and the and the backend software? They own whatever middleware and other technology has taken over a year more than even the most recent estimate to get running. It looks as if it *ought* to be simple, but clearly it's not. You think it's simple. OK, if you say so. I said it LOOKS as if it OUGHT to be simple sigh, but clearly it isn't. That's not the same as saying IT IS SIMPLE and that they've botched it. Right, I'll rephrase then... You think it looks like it ought to be simple. OK, if you say so... If I can by a coffee at Starbucks by waving a CPC, and it ends up on my bill at the end of the month, it does seem as if waving a CPC at a gate ought to register my presence with enough information to bill me overnight once I've also registered a touch-out. But clearly it's all a lot more complicated than that, given the kerfuffle to get it all in place. -- Roland Perry |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:36:50 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: If I can by a coffee at Starbucks by waving a CPC, and it ends up on my bill at the end of the month, it does seem as if waving a CPC at a gate ought to register my presence with enough information to bill me overnight once I've also registered a touch-out. But clearly it's all a lot more complicated than that, given the kerfuffle to get it all in place. I wonder how they (or the bank) deals with a card that accesses an account with nothing in it and no overdraft allowed. Does the bank have some sort of "special" overdraft for that or do they just refuse payment and the vendor is out of pocket as can happen with credit cards? -- Spud |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17.09.14 16:36, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:13:19 on Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Mizter T remarked: So TfL owns the right to the MiFare system, smart card readers and contactless bank cards does it? Umm , no. So what is left - the gates and the and the backend software? They own whatever middleware and other technology has taken over a year more than even the most recent estimate to get running. It looks as if it *ought* to be simple, but clearly it's not. You think it's simple. OK, if you say so. I said it LOOKS as if it OUGHT to be simple sigh, but clearly it isn't. That's not the same as saying IT IS SIMPLE and that they've botched it. Right, I'll rephrase then... You think it looks like it ought to be simple. OK, if you say so... If I can by a coffee at Starbucks by waving a CPC, and it ends up on my bill at the end of the month, it does seem as if waving a CPC at a gate ought to register my presence with enough information to bill me overnight once I've also registered a touch-out. But clearly it's all a lot more complicated than that, given the kerfuffle to get it all in place. @TfLOfficial said that over 42,000 journeys were made on Tuesday, using contactless. It would be interesting to see how that has increased day-on-day. I also who wonder who is next due to follow suit here in the Uk with contactless. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:28:35 on Wed, 17 Sep
2014, " remarked: I also who wonder who is next due to follow suit here in the Uk with contactless. No doubt the trade press is queuing up to print 'vapourware' stories from other operators. After all, they've been doing it for TfL for the last three years. VISA say: "Transport authorities across the world are investing in contactless payment technology to drive down the cost of ticketing, reduce queues and increase efficiency." and "Many transit agencies across Europe are now seeking to build Visa contactless acceptance into their future ticketing strategies due to the uniquely compelling nature of the propositions they represent." But don't actually mention any examples of who, other than a couple of uncaptioned photos from TfL. -- Roland Perry |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 17/09/2014 17:44, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 17:28:35 on Wed, 17 Sep 2014, " remarked: I also who wonder who is next due to follow suit here in the Uk with contactless. No doubt the trade press is queuing up to print 'vapourware' stories from other operators. After all, they've been doing it for TfL for the last three years. VISA say: "Transport authorities across the world are investing in contactless payment technology to drive down the cost of ticketing, reduce queues and increase efficiency." and "Many transit agencies across Europe are now seeking to build Visa contactless acceptance into their future ticketing strategies due to the uniquely compelling nature of the propositions they represent." But don't actually mention any examples of who, other than a couple of uncaptioned photos from TfL. This vapourware concept you're so very keen on and contactless in London - how do you describe it - the gases have now solidified? |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote
No doubt the trade press is queuing up to print 'vapourware' stories from other operators. After all, they've been doing it for TfL for the last three years. VISA say: "Transport authorities across the world are investing in contactless payment technology to drive down the cost of ticketing, reduce queues and increase efficiency." and "Many transit agencies across Europe are now seeking to build Visa contactless acceptance into their future ticketing strategies due to the uniquely compelling nature of the propositions they represent." But don't actually mention any examples of who, other than a couple of uncaptioned photos from TfL. The first is observable, at least when the technology goes live or even when the contact is signed. The second is just an aspiration and not observable until something actually happens. -- Mike D |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() contactless. This is especially difficult as many (USA at least) tourists arriving in London will have bought one of the latter at the airport (where they are marketed aggressively) in order to get over the C&P thing where their cards may not be compatible, and of course in order to have their money in their pocket in Sterling. Does the bank have some sort of "special" overdraft for that or do they just refuse payment and the vendor is out of pocket as can happen with credit cards? On the other hand, TfL has gone out of its way in the past to say that certain foreign issued and prepay cards won't be accepted. But it's not clear if they mean "because they aren't contactless - duh!" or whether they fail TfL's risk management tests due to the possibility of being dry. Now that CPC is fully rolled out, I expect we'll see more information about both TfL's position on this issue and also war stories from disappointed would-be travellers. One possibility is that while they won't be able to get a balance from the bank in the milliseconds it takes to touch in, maybe by at least overnight they'll know to blacklist such a card's future use. -- Roland Perry There are two different types of contactless cards around: i) just emulates the magnetic strip ii) is connected to the EMV chip. It's the first (mostly USA issued) which won't be accepted. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL, Oyster, contactless payment cards and Apple Pay. | London Transport | |||
Contactless and revenue checks | London Transport | |||
Contactless payment on tube | London Transport | |||
Contactless ('wave-and-pay') payment progress? | London Transport |