| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
December 29th 15, 07:37 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
By Londons Northern Line to Battersea
In message , at 21:19:39 on
Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jarle Hammen Knudsen remarked: Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. Only if your news client ignores the "References" field: -- Roland Perry |
|
#32
December 29th 15, 07:43 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Londons Northern Line to Battersea
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:19:39 +0100, Jarle Hammen Knudsen
wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:18:24 +0000, e27002 aurora wrote: Subject: By Londons Northern Line to Battersea Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. It makes a mess. Original subject was "By Northern Line to Battersea". Because readers in misc.transport.urban-transit may not know that the "Northern Line" and "Battersea" relate to London, England. |
|
#33
December 29th 15, 07:48 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By London's Northern Line to Battersea
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:37:54 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 21:19:39 on Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jarle Hammen Knudsen remarked: Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. Only if your news client ignores the "References" field: Which client are you using Roland? I am using Forte Agent. |
|
#34
December 29th 15, 08:13 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Northern Line to Battersea
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:58:07 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: Not exactly as I understand it. They will all go via Bank instead of some going via Charing Cross. That's one way of putting it. The other is that all Charing X trains go to Battersea, with additional trains running via Bank to Morden. Either way, there will be more stock, and more trains running. Are these new trains going to be more of the same design or will they be completely new? One would hope the latter given the current 95 stock are a 20 year old design. -- Spud |
|
#35
December 29th 15, 08:19 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By London's Northern Line to Battersea
In message , at 20:48:54 on
Tue, 29 Dec 2015, e27002 aurora remarked: Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. Only if your news client ignores the "References" field: Which client are you using Roland? I am using Forte Agent. It's in the headers (again). Turnpike. -- Roland Perry |
|
#36
December 29th 15, 08:41 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Londons Northern Line to Battersea
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:43:26 +0000
e27002 aurora wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:19:39 +0100, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:18:24 +0000, e27002 aurora wrote: Subject: By Londons Northern Line to Battersea Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. It makes a mess. Original subject was "By Northern Line to Battersea". Because readers in misc.transport.urban-transit may not know that the "Northern Line" and "Battersea" relate to London, England. They probably don't care either and if they did they'd probably already subscribe to utl. -- Spud |
|
#37
December 29th 15, 08:41 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Londons Northern Line to Battersea
"Jarle Hammen Knudsen" wrote On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:18:24 +0000, e27002 aurora wrote: Subject: By Londons Northern Line to Battersea Why are you changing the subject line? It creates a new thread each time you do that. It makes a mess. Original subject was "By Northern Line to Battersea". Only if your newsreader wants it that way. Forte Agent has a profile option to show new thread if subject changes, I expect you have it ON. -- Mike D |
|
#38
December 29th 15, 08:46 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Northern Line to Battersea
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:58:07 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: Not exactly as I understand it. They will all go via Bank instead of some going via Charing Cross. That's one way of putting it. The other is that all Charing X trains go to Battersea, with additional trains running via Bank to Morden. Either way, there will be more stock, and more trains running. Are these new trains going to be more of the same design or will they be completely new? One would hope the latter given the current 95 stock are a 20 year old design. Could be either. They'll be required to be externally similar (doors of the same size, in the same places, same driving controls) but can have more modern technology underneath. But, given that it won't be a huge order, Alstom must have a good chance of winning the contest, with an updated version of the 95 stock. Some of the order will be for the Jubilee line, which also needs a bigger fleet to support more frequent services. |
|
#39
December 29th 15, 09:02 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Northern Line to Battersea
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:46:05 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:58:07 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: Not exactly as I understand it. They will all go via Bank instead of some going via Charing Cross. That's one way of putting it. The other is that all Charing X trains go to Battersea, with additional trains running via Bank to Morden. Either way, there will be more stock, and more trains running. Are these new trains going to be more of the same design or will they be completely new? One would hope the latter given the current 95 stock are a 20 year old design. Could be either. They'll be required to be externally similar (doors of the same size, in the same places, same driving controls) but can have more modern technology underneath. But, given that it won't be a huge order, Alstom must have a good chance of winning the contest, with an updated That would be logical. However TfL and logic are only nodding aquaintances. I refer you to the 2009 stock that they made too big to run on the piccadilly line so has to be carted in and out of northumberland park by lorry , then they go and waste the few inches of extra space with extra thick interior decor. version of the 95 stock. Some of the order will be for the Jubilee line, which also needs a bigger fleet to support more frequent services. Would be nice if they made them walk through. God knows, the northern line trains need every bit of extra space they can get in the rush hour. -- Spud |
|
#40
December 29th 15, 09:06 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
By Londons Northern Line to Battersea
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| By London's Northern Line to Battersea | London Transport | |||
| Battersea Northern Line extension now done with a loan? | London Transport | |||
| Northern Line to Battersea Power Station | London Transport | |||
| Northern Line Extension To Battersea | London Transport | |||
| Northern line to battersea | London Transport | |||
Linear Mode
