![]() |
Turning London orange
TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into
the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ |
Turning London orange
Neil Williams wrote:
On 2016-09-21 20:31:00 +0000, Recliner said: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ Interesting. If they do get all those, I wonder would some kind of line naming or German-style route numbering make sense? A big map of orange lines is not an awful lot more useful than what is the case now. Yes, I think a German-style route numbering system would make sense. That's probably already true of the existing Overground, let alone the much expanded one envisaged. |
Turning London orange
On 2016\09\21 21:31, Recliner wrote:
TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ Thanks. Looks like Deptford Park (Surrey Canal Road) is not getting built at all! |
Turning London orange
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 03:23:04 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2016\09\21 21:31, Recliner wrote: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ Thanks. Looks like Deptford Park (Surrey Canal Road) is not getting built at all! New Bermondsey Shirley ? It seems to be dependant on if/when the related development gets finished (or even started). This month's start date seems to be some time next year. https://www.lewisham.gov.uk/inmyarea...d-answers.aspx |
Turning London orange
In message
-sept ember.org, at 21:37:34 on Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Recliner remarked: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ Interesting. If they do get all those, I wonder would some kind of line naming or German-style route numbering make sense? A big map of orange lines is not an awful lot more useful than what is the case now. Yes, I think a German-style route numbering system would make sense. That's probably already true of the existing Overground, let alone the much expanded one envisaged. Ditto for Thameslink - and most of the existing documentation shows it split into the various routes already. -- Roland Perry |
Turning London orange
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:02:07 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: In message -sept ember.org, at 21:37:34 on Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Recliner remarked: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...very-different 6143328/ Interesting. If they do get all those, I wonder would some kind of line naming or German-style route numbering make sense? A big map of orange lines is not an awful lot more useful than what is the case now. Yes, I think a German-style route numbering system would make sense. That's probably already true of the existing Overground, let alone the much expanded one envisaged. Ditto for Thameslink - and most of the existing documentation shows it split into the various routes already. Couldn't hurt doing it on the DLR either. -- Spud |
Turning London orange
On 21.09.16 21:31, Recliner wrote:
TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ I got an idea. Let's just turn the entire network, from Penzance to Wick, orange. |
Turning London orange
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:29:59 +0100
" wrote: On 21.09.16 21:31, Recliner wrote: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...very-different 6143328/ I got an idea. Let's just turn the entire network, from Penzance to Wick, orange. Indeed. Its really not very well thought out if this is an official TfL mock up. And what the obsession with TfL taking over all the south london lines is god knows. Anyone who thinks the unions will give them an easy time because they're a public corp rather than a TOC has obviously been living in a cave for the last 20 years. -- Spud |
Turning London orange
TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into
the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...erent-6143328/ I got an idea. Let's just turn the entire network, from Penzance to Wick, orange. I note a bunch of arrows at the ends of the various lines, so based on the text that says they want to take over the various franchises, I assume we'd have TfL at least as far as Kings Lynn. It would certainly be handy to pay for my jaunts between Cambridge and Ely with my senior Oyster. |
Turning London orange
wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:29:59 +0100 " wrote: On 21.09.16 21:31, Recliner wrote: TfL's grand vision for turning London's suburban overground services into the Overground: http://metro.co.uk/2016/09/21/london...very-different 6143328/ I got an idea. Let's just turn the entire network, from Penzance to Wick, orange. Indeed. Its really not very well thought out if this is an official TfL mock up. And what the obsession with TfL taking over all the south london lines is god knows. Anyone who thinks the unions will give them an easy time because they're a public corp rather than a TOC has obviously been living in a cave for the last 20 years. -- Spud The seem to think that they can magic up slots to provide a 10 minute frequency on every route whilst this might work on the routes that terminate inside (or just outside) of the London "Zone", this is not going to work for the routes which carry main line services to the coast tim |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk