Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping for the tube would be reasonable. With the amount of tourists who go 1 or 2 stops because they're too lazy to walk (no excuse not to have some kind of map these days) they'd probably clean up. (a) it would involve buying-out Heathrow's private infrastructure and somehow compensating them for the lost premium fare revenue on HEx An easier way would be to make it part of the condition for a 3rd runway. "You want a runway that will blight the lives of millions of londoners, cause untold extra pollution both on the ground and in the air and will cost taxpayers a fortune? Then hand over Hex" |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/03/2018 11:25, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping Does that include travel cards? |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:31:20 +0000
Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:25, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping Does that include travel cards? What travel cards? You'd pay a flat fare per trip. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/03/2018 11:46, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:31:20 +0000 Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:25, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping Does that include travel cards? What travel cards? You'd pay a flat fare per trip. Potentially more than doubling the cost of some annual fares? Yes, I can see that being a popular policy.... |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:26:01 +0000
Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:46, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:31:20 +0000 Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:25, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping Does that include travel cards? What travel cards? You'd pay a flat fare per trip. Potentially more than doubling the cost of some annual fares? Yes, I can see that being a popular policy.... Why would it? For people who simply commute in and out it would be cheaper unless they're only commuting within zone 1. If you mean travel cards for national rail, too bad, they can pay the tube fare or walk. The difference would have to be made up somewhere. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/03/2018 12:46, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:26:01 +0000 Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:46, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:31:20 +0000 Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 11:25, wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:36 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:39:40 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: It really is time to ditch this overcomplicated nonsense and bring in flat fares as is done in many other parts of the world. If it can work on the buses it can work on TfLs tube and train lines. Except the flat fare on a bus differs from the flat fare on the tube, which differs from the flat fare on a train. I wouldn't expect it to be the same tbh. You'd sit in a traffic jam in a bus if you wanted cheap, you'd pay more if you wanted to get their faster by the tube. I reckon 2-3 quid flat fare with no capping Does that include travel cards? What travel cards? You'd pay a flat fare per trip. Potentially more than doubling the cost of some annual fares? Yes, I can see that being a popular policy.... Why would it? For people who simply commute in and out it would be cheaper unless they're only commuting within zone 1. If you mean travel cards for national rail, too bad, they can pay the tube fare or walk. The difference would have to be made up somewhere. 2 journeys a day in zone 3, £6. Include weekends, but no extra trips. 6 * 365 = £2190 Zone 3-4 travelcard = £1020 Yes, there are holidays and so on but then again some people make lots of trips on top of commuting so it may even out. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:17:14 +0000
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 11:25:15 on Mon, 19 Mar 2018, remarked: (a) it would involve buying-out Heathrow's private infrastructure and somehow compensating them for the lost premium fare revenue on HEx An easier way would be to make it part of the condition for a 3rd runway. "You want a runway that will blight the lives of millions of londoners, cause untold extra pollution both on the ground and in the air and will cost taxpayers a fortune? Then hand over Hex" Part of the problem with that, is the main reason for HEx is to abstract traffic from black cabs, aiming at the market for whom it's "A cab or the Airport Express", and whatever you do to try to persuade them to use what feels to a visitor like the local metro, doesn't deliver. Possibly, but I would guess that the majority of people who would prefer to take a train to central london don't want to pay extortionate fares only to be dumped at paddington. If anything a new 3rd runway will need HEx even more, to deliver the pollution reduction targets. Given an airliner can use anything up to a ton of fuel (747) just to taxi around a large airport such as Heathrow , the contribution of ground traffic to the overall pollution increase that the 3rd runway will cause is probably negligable. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:54:58 +0000
Someone Somewhere wrote: On 19/03/2018 12:46, wrote: If you mean travel cards for national rail, too bad, they can pay the tube fare or walk. The difference would have to be made up somewhere. 2 journeys a day in zone 3, £6. Include weekends, but no extra trips. 6 * 365 = £2190 Zone 3-4 travelcard = £1020 Zone 1-4 = 1960, 1-5 = 2328, 1-6 = 2492 Plus 3 quid was at my upper limit, 2.50 IMO would be more reasonable so the cost comes down to 5 * 365 = 1825. Subtract weekends and its 5 * 260 = 1300 Yes, there are holidays and so on but then again some people make lots of trips on top of commuting so it may even out. Some people, yes, but with a flat fare someone will always end up paying more or it wouldn't be viable, but everyone benefits from a simpler fare system plus its less costly to administer, the savings of which can be passed back to the passenger. Plus there's a chance fare dodging could drop depending on how they rejigged the entry gates - you can't force your way through or over a head high turnstile (at least not without people noticing) like in the paris metro and numerous football grounds. Exit gates could be a simple waist high one. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2014 TfL fares announced | London Transport | |||
2014 fares - announced soon? | London Transport | |||
Piccadilly line extension to Terminal 5/Heathrow Express extension to T5 | London Transport | |||
Massive Airport expansion announced | London Transport |