Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:54:37 +0100, Robin wrote:
On 13/07/2019 11:22, tim... wrote: the fallacy of the sunk costs That (like loss aversion and status quo bias) is an issue with the mental state of decision takers. It's not an argument against decisions on whether or not to proceed based on objective assessments of the options as they stand now - taking account of both work already done and lessons from that work for the likely future costs. I did not mention costs, merely inconvenience. Costs there have certainly been but not payable by the public purse but by those inconvenienced. Roads closed, diversions in place (one road closed for 9 years we are told - a road that I often used but now have a significant detour). Guy Gorton |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Gorton" wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:54:37 +0100, Robin wrote: On 13/07/2019 11:22, tim... wrote: the fallacy of the sunk costs That (like loss aversion and status quo bias) is an issue with the mental state of decision takers. It's not an argument against decisions on whether or not to proceed based on objective assessments of the options as they stand now - taking account of both work already done and lessons from that work for the likely future costs. I did not mention costs, merely inconvenience. inconvenience *is* a cost just not one borne by the developer tim |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/07/2019 16:11, Guy Gorton wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:54:37 +0100, Robin wrote: On 13/07/2019 11:22, tim... wrote: the fallacy of the sunk costs That (like loss aversion and status quo bias) is an issue with the mental state of decision takers. It's not an argument against decisions on whether or not to proceed based on objective assessments of the options as they stand now - taking account of both work already done and lessons from that work for the likely future costs. I did not mention costs, merely inconvenience. Costs there have certainly been but not payable by the public purse but by those inconvenienced. Roads closed, diversions in place (one road closed for 9 years we are told - a road that I often used but now have a significant detour). I was commenting on "the fallacy of the sunk costs". But I agree with tim... that inconvenience is a cost. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Breaking news: Crossrail opening delayed | London Transport | |||
TfL acknowledges contactless technology risk | London Transport | |||
Commuters suffer while Crowe inflates his ego even further | London Transport | |||
Commuters suffer while Crowe inflates his ego even further | London Transport | |||
"Flooding risk to Thames tunnels" | London Transport |