London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 07:51 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,071
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 07:55 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,619
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On 28/02/2020 08:51, tim... wrote:
The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.


The more interesting thing is campaigners are intending to challenge
road schemes on the same grounds which could have a beneficial effect on
the economics of rail expansion and electrification schemes.

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.

  #3   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 08:02 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,320
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On 28/02/2020 08:51, tim... wrote:
The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.


Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.

--
Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to
Pom Poko - 2019 - Birthday
  #4   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 08:04 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2019
Posts: 641
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

Graeme Wall wrote:
On 28/02/2020 08:51, tim... wrote:
The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.


The more interesting thing is campaigners are intending to challenge
road schemes on the same grounds which could have a beneficial effect on
the economics of rail expansion and electrification schemes.


The same campaigners also challenge rail schemes, as we've seen with HS2.

The same ruling will also apply to any other airport expansion, which may
not please the government and London mayor quite so much.

  #5   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 08:06 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2013
Posts: 152
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:02:50 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.


Is there an official description of topics for this group?

--
jhk


  #6   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 08:13 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2019
Posts: 641
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

Basil Jet wrote:
On 28/02/2020 08:51, tim... wrote:
The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.


Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.


Why is it off topic? Is London's major airport not something to do with
transport in London?

  #7   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 08:23 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,320
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On 28/02/2020 09:13, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 28/02/2020 08:51, tim... wrote:
The usual suspects not interested in discussing this then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51658693.


Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.


Why is it off topic? Is London's major airport not something to do with
transport in London?


I thought I was in a different group!

--
Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to
Pom Poko - 2019 - Birthday
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 10:16 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 120
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On 2020-02-28, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:02:50 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.


Is there an official description of topics for this group?


http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.transport.london.html

Eric
--
ms fnd in a lbry
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 10:32 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2019
Posts: 316
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:16:41 +0100
Eric wrote:
On 2020-02-28, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:02:50 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.


Is there an official description of topics for this group?


http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.transport.london.html


There was a sudden drastic drop in the number of posts to this group last
year. I suspect its no longer carried on a number of servers for whatever
reason.

  #10   Report Post  
Old February 28th 20, 10:56 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 120
Default Heathrow expansion plans "illegal"

On 2020-02-28, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:16:41 +0100
Eric wrote:
On 2020-02-28, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:02:50 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

Thank you for posting an off-topic message to the group, without "OT".
And then insulting everyone else for not doing it before you.

Is there an official description of topics for this group?


http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.transport.london.html

There was a sudden drastic drop in the number of posts to this group last
year. I suspect its no longer carried on a number of servers for whatever
reason.


That was because Google blocked it in Google Groups - because it was
full of spam - which was only there because they allowed it. I don't
think that there's any evidence that other servers have dropped it.

I don't quite see what that has to do with me posting a link to the
group charter.

Eric
--
ms fnd in a lbry


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tories 20BN railway to replace Heathrow expansion (St Pancras isHeathrow T6, again) Mizter T London Transport 37 October 16th 08 12:51 PM
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? Dr Ivan D. Reid London Transport 0 December 16th 07 08:47 AM
"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow. CJB London Transport 63 August 23rd 07 08:51 PM
Circumcision Should Be Made Illegal [email protected] London Transport 2 February 3rd 06 01:10 AM
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. Gordon Joly London Transport 9 January 3rd 04 02:58 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017