London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 29th 20, 04:05 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2019
Posts: 299
Default TfL expanding its empire

How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...-suburban-take
over-plan


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 29th 20, 05:14 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,983
Default TfL expanding its empire

In message , at 16:05:20 on Mon, 29 Jun
2020, remarked:
How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...fl-inner-subur
ban-take over-plan


If they can do better job than GTR, it would be OK. But one of GTR's
problems is that as probably the busiest classic franchise, they have
bitten off more than they can chew.
--
Roland Perry
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 29th 20, 06:24 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,313
Default TfL expanding its empire

On 29/06/2020 18:14, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:05:20 on Mon, 29 Jun
2020, remarked:
How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...fl-inner-subur
ban-take over-plan


If they can do better job than GTR, it would be OK. But one of GTR's
problems is that as probably the busiest classic franchise, they have
bitten off more than they can chew.


I think RAIL's info seems a bit out of date... I don't think any inner
suburbans go past Stevenage any more.

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/202...into-moorgate/
.... has a little more info.

How should it be branded. Some people will suggest it should be part of
the Overground, but I think it's more logical to make it part of the
Underground, as the line south of Drayton Park used to be. Stations like
Drayton Park and Essex Road would get more use if they were branded as
U-D, even without any change to frequency, because the U-D has a better
reputation than the O-D. Also Highbury & Islington already has O-D
platforms, and the corridor signage would be impenetrable if it had two
more.

The only potential downside is that the less than stellar service at
stations like Bayford would tarnish the U-D brand, but like Chesham it's
a station that's only used by locals and so won't damage the U-D brand
in the way a bad service at Old Street would. I suspect enthusiasts will
say a train with pantographs should not be part of the U-D, but I don't
think that is a valid basis for quite an important business decision.

I'd call it the Finsbury Line, because it serves Finsbury Park as well
as Finsbury Square / Circus. Or maybe the Alexandra Line - anything but
the Northern City Line, a name that has to be burned at the stake for
wilfully spreading confusion.

--
Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to
Cleaners From Venus - 1981 - Blow Away Your Troubles (2012 version)
  #4   Report Post  
Old June 29th 20, 07:35 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2017
Posts: 37
Default TfL expanding its empire

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:24:05 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote:

On 29/06/2020 18:14, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:05:20 on Mon, 29 Jun
2020, remarked:
How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...fl-inner-subur
ban-take over-plan


If they can do better job than GTR, it would be OK. But one of GTR's
problems is that as probably the busiest classic franchise, they have
bitten off more than they can chew.


I think RAIL's info seems a bit out of date... I don't think any inner
suburbans go past Stevenage any more.

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/202...into-moorgate/
... has a little more info.

How should it be branded. Some people will suggest it should be part of
the Overground, but I think it's more logical to make it part of the
Underground, as the line south of Drayton Park used to be. Stations like
Drayton Park and Essex Road would get more use if they were branded as
U-D, even without any change to frequency, because the U-D has a better
reputation than the O-D. Also Highbury & Islington already has O-D
platforms, and the corridor signage would be impenetrable if it had two
more.

The only potential downside is that the less than stellar service at
stations like Bayford would tarnish the U-D brand, but like Chesham it's
a station that's only used by locals and so won't damage the U-D brand
in the way a bad service at Old Street would. I suspect enthusiasts will
say a train with pantographs should not be part of the U-D, but I don't
think that is a valid basis for quite an important business decision.

I'd call it the Finsbury Line, because it serves Finsbury Park as well
as Finsbury Square / Circus. Or maybe the Alexandra Line - anything but
the Northern City Line, a name that has to be burned at the stake for
wilfully spreading confusion.


Could make the challenge to visit all the Underground stations much
more interesting!

Is there a challenge for all the Underground, Overground and TFL rail
yet?
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 29th 20, 09:31 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2018
Posts: 148
Default TfL expanding its empire

Basil Jet wrote:
On 29/06/2020 18:14, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:05:20 on Mon, 29 Jun
2020, remarked:
How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...fl-inner-subur
ban-take over-plan


If they can do better job than GTR, it would be OK. But one of GTR's
problems is that as probably the busiest classic franchise, they have
bitten off more than they can chew.


I think RAIL's info seems a bit out of date... I don't think any inner
suburbans go past Stevenage any more.

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/202...into-moorgate/
... has a little more info.

How should it be branded. Some people will suggest it should be part of
the Overground, but I think it's more logical to make it part of the
Underground, as the line south of Drayton Park used to be. Stations like
Drayton Park and Essex Road would get more use if they were branded as
U-D, even without any change to frequency, because the U-D has a better
reputation than the O-D. Also Highbury & Islington already has O-D
platforms, and the corridor signage would be impenetrable if it had two
more.

The only potential downside is that the less than stellar service at
stations like Bayford would tarnish the U-D brand, but like Chesham it's
a station that's only used by locals and so won't damage the U-D brand
in the way a bad service at Old Street would. I suspect enthusiasts will
say a train with pantographs should not be part of the U-D, but I don't
think that is a valid basis for quite an important business decision.

I'd call it the Finsbury Line, because it serves Finsbury Park as well
as Finsbury Square / Circus. Or maybe the Alexandra Line - anything but
the Northern City Line, a name that has to be burned at the stake for
wilfully spreading confusion.


While the Underground has apart from the interlude from the late 70’s to
the 90’s when it had an off period enjoyed a reasonably good reputation
since the LPTB built on the foundations of quality laid by the Combine
there has alway been the odd corner that didn’t reach it.
The Northern City line was one of them, a half finished scheme that was an
oddment that came into Metropolitan Railways ownership but even they
couldn’t do much with it and its ambience when transferred to the Northern
line did not improve.
The transfer to British Rail enabling it to perform its original brief
actually improved it though it has fot pretty rough around the edges again
in the past couple of decades. It would be ironical it it returned to the
successor of the LPTB to improve it now.
As for electrification it once had its own version of fourth rail with both
current rails on the outside up till 1939 when tube stock replaced the
original stock.
LPTB was running 3 variety’s of live rail installations up till then,
the 4 th rail system as is still used,
the 4th rail system of the GN&C and the central 3rd of the Central line
which was also replaced around then.

If the Met had adopted the proposed 3 phase system we would have had
pantographs galore.
I always wondered how they would have squeezed the overhead into the
tunnels but recently
came across a source which I must find again which suggested it was going
to be quite a complicated system with the wires set to one side at cant
rail level with a twin pick up on the side , not dissimilar in a way to the
old Glasgow Subway which obtained lighting power from small live rails on
the subway wall. Easy to do on the subway with no junctions, gawd knows
how the Met would have coped with those with different sets of pick ups
being retracted and extended.

Pantagraphs on the side do exist overseas on some freight locos where the
catenary is switched to one side to enable top loading of bulk wagons .

If the Met had chosen the Ganz system the top of Sarah Siddons might
resemble this.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantog...11_0000945.jpg

GH




  #6   Report Post  
Old June 30th 20, 11:10 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2019
Posts: 299
Default TfL expanding its empire

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:24:05 +0100
Basil Jet wrote:
On 29/06/2020 18:14, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:05:20 on Mon, 29 Jun
2020, remarked:
How long before TfL is renamed to Network Southeast?

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/ne...fl-inner-subur
ban-take over-plan


If they can do better job than GTR, it would be OK. But one of GTR's
problems is that as probably the busiest classic franchise, they have
bitten off more than they can chew.


I think RAIL's info seems a bit out of date... I don't think any inner
suburbans go past Stevenage any more.

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/202...keover-of-grea
t-northern-line-into-moorgate/
.... has a little more info.

How should it be branded. Some people will suggest it should be part of
the Overground, but I think it's more logical to make it part of the
Underground, as the line south of Drayton Park used to be. Stations like


Doesn't make sense to me. Its part of NR despite being in tunnel and it can
only be used by mainline stock, not LU stock.

Its a shame the Northern Heights branch was never completed as Crouch End could
really used a tube station. Even more so Muswell Hill which is probably the
only large suburb in north london without any station at all. Yes you can
get a bus to alexandra palace station but its hardly convenient.

I'd call it the Finsbury Line, because it serves Finsbury Park as well
as Finsbury Square / Circus. Or maybe the Alexandra Line - anything but
the Northern City Line, a name that has to be burned at the stake for
wilfully spreading confusion.


IMO the Northern City line was a daft name, it should have been called
something entirely seperate. Fingate Line or something.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Empire Way (Wembley Plaza Hotel) Aglians London Transport 13 May 19th 07 11:04 AM
Its all safe again. Mal London Transport 3 January 18th 06 04:04 PM
Wembley Empire exhibition on BBC2 now John Rowland London Transport 0 January 9th 05 01:08 AM
Technology for its own sake? Boltar London Transport 59 October 14th 04 11:12 PM
East London Extension now has its own website dan London Transport 8 July 28th 03 11:20 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017