London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old August 23rd 04, 07:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 62
Default CTRL to benefit Kent: What services?

Add on to Richard's excellent summary that the trains need to be capable
of running with AWS, TPWS, TVM, KVB, to fit the UK standard loading
gauge, to be able to support CSR and GSM-R, to satisfy the EMI/EMC
characteristics of the UK conventional trains, to operate at both 25kV
and 750DC with automated changeover between the two, possibly to have a
capability to work on limited 25kV current if they escape to a BR AC
area, etc.

John

In article , Richard
Catlow writes
Alex Terrell wrote:


I pointed out that the Amtrak Metroliners had proved decades ago that
front doors weren't incompatible with high speeds, and they passed that
info on to the train manufacturers.

Yes indeed the Metroliners do have end corridor connections, but if I
recall correctly they are limited to 125 MPH.

Until the end of 2001 I was the head of Electrification & Plant for
Union Railways and was initmately involved in the development of the
CTRL domestic rolling stock specification. A few facts:

The units have to be 6 coaches long in order to prevent both
pantographs (1 per unit) from entering the long carrier wire neutral
setions. If they did, a phase to phase short circuit at 44kV would
result.

In order to maintain the required line capacity, the units were
specified to have a top speed of 140MPH (225 Km/h), with a high rate
of accelleration. The crashworthiness standards for stock of this
speed are very stringent unless you want to end up with the farce
applied to the like of pendolinos where the front half of each leading
vehicle cannot be used for passenger accommodation - a complete non
starter for a commuter train where bums on seats is paramount.

We consulted 7 rolling stock manufacturers over the crashworthiness
standards and end loadings and not one of them could satisfactorily
engineer the requisite stength with a central corridor connection.

So for other posters on this thread - 16 train cars? Are you serious.
Which platforms could accommodate them (apart from the eurostar
platforms), certainly not rural station platforms unless they were
split to 2 x 8 cars. That's not in the spec, so don't expect that to
happen either!

Richard


--
John Alexander,


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"South Bank to benefit from zone 1 stations" [email protected] London Transport 3 May 28th 14 05:45 PM
Benefit cost ratio on street signs Basil Jet[_2_] London Transport 1 August 1st 10 06:22 PM
Would Oyster benefit me? Demiurge London Transport 11 September 5th 06 06:55 PM
North London commuters to benefit from secure cycle parking in Finsbury Park TravelBot London Transport News 0 March 24th 06 08:23 AM
Hayes (Kent) line The Only Living Boy in New Cross London Transport 6 February 8th 04 04:01 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017