Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Catlow wrote:
Alex Terrell wrote: I pointed out that the Amtrak Metroliners had proved decades ago that front doors weren't incompatible with high speeds, and they passed that info on to the train manufacturers. Yes indeed the Metroliners do have end corridor connections, but if I recall correctly they are limited to 125 MPH. They were designed to run at 160mph. It was only the poor state of the track that limited them to 125mph. Until the end of 2001 I was the head of Electrification & Plant for Union Railways and was initmately involved in the development of the CTRL domestic rolling stock specification. A few facts: The units have to be 6 coaches long in order to prevent both pantographs (1 per unit) from entering the long carrier wire neutral setions. If they did, a phase to phase short circuit at 44kV would result. How come? In order to maintain the required line capacity, the units were specified to have a top speed of 140MPH (225 Km/h), with a high rate of accelleration. The crashworthiness standards for stock of this speed are very stringent unless you want to end up with the farce applied to the like of pendolinos where the front half of each leading vehicle cannot be used for passenger accommodation - a complete non starter for a commuter train where bums on seats is paramount. I thought crashworthiness requirements under ATP were lower. If they aren't, why aren't they. It's ridiculous mandating such high standards on a line where there's nothing to crash into! An exemption should be sought even if it requires special legislation to get it. We consulted 7 rolling stock manufacturers over the crashworthiness standards and end loadings and not one of them could satisfactorily engineer the requisite stength with a central corridor connection. Any idea how far short of the standard the Metroliners fell? So for other posters on this thread - 16 train cars? Are you serious. Which platforms could accommodate them (apart from the eurostar platforms), certainly not rural station platforms unless they were split to 2 x 8 cars. That's not in the spec, so don't expect that to happen either! Are you sure it's not in the spec? UIVMM all the consultation options included some offpeak splitting at Ashford. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"South Bank to benefit from zone 1 stations" | London Transport | |||
Benefit cost ratio on street signs | London Transport | |||
Would Oyster benefit me? | London Transport | |||
North London commuters to benefit from secure cycle parking in Finsbury Park | London Transport News | |||
Hayes (Kent) line | London Transport |