Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes However, if they had, would it have allowed access for reversal without considerable new construction? I am more surprised in retrospect that no running connection between the Piccadilly and Victoria lines was put in which would have been trivially simple. There is a connection both east/northbound and west/southbound between the Picc and Victoria lines for engineers trains. As the signalling systems are so different from each other (the Victoria is automatic), it would not be possible to run 73 stock on the Vic. or 67 stock on the Picc. other than under a total possession. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The wrong way up | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Wrong kind of pressure | London Transport | |||
top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport |