Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , ] (Steve
Fitzgerald) wrote: In message , Colin Rosenstiel writes However, if they had, would it have allowed access for reversal without considerable new construction? I am more surprised in retrospect that no running connection between the Piccadilly and Victoria lines was put in which would have been trivially simple. There is a connection both east/northbound and west/southbound between the Picc and Victoria lines for engineers trains. As the signalling systems are so different from each other (the Victoria is automatic), it would not be possible to run 73 stock on the Vic. or 67 stock on the Picc. other than under a total possession. Hmm. I don't recall seeing those connections on line diagrams from the days when the Victoria Line was built. I appreciate the signalling incompatibilities. My point wasn't relevant to the current Piccadilly problems. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The wrong way up | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Wrong kind of pressure | London Transport | |||
top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport |