London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 10:21 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Tunnel damage

Well, at the Saturday press conference two days after the bombing Tim
O'Toole stated that the Piccadilly line tunnel was intact,


Just from what I've seen in the media and by the consequences of the
bombs it seems to me that they weren't all that powerful (otherwise
the carriages would have completely annihalated and no one inside
would have survived) so I suspect damage to the tunnels (which are
built a lot stronger than the trains) is probably limited to damaged
cabling and track.

B2003

  #2   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 12:21 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Default Tunnel damage



Boltar wrote:
Well, at the Saturday press conference two days after the bombing Tim
O'Toole stated that the Piccadilly line tunnel was intact,


Just from what I've seen in the media and by the consequences of the
bombs it seems to me that they weren't all that powerful (otherwise
the carriages would have completely annihalated and no one inside
would have survived) so I suspect damage to the tunnels (which are
built a lot stronger than the trains) is probably limited to damaged
cabling and track.

B2003


Cabling can be a problem though. It was on the news a while ago. The
reason the Northern Line took so long to get working last time that had
an accident was that they didn't have any up to date wiring diagrams.
If the Piccadilly line is the same then that could take a while too.

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 20th 05, 04:14 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Default Tunnel damage

"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote:
How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the rear
four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail towards
King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would have been
the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at least one of
them should have been able to be removed by rail.

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3)




  #6   Report Post  
Old July 20th 05, 04:44 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Tunnel damage

Patrick SIU wrote:
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote:
How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the
rear four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail
towards King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would
have been the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at
least one of them should have been able to be removed by rail.

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3)


Yes.


  #7   Report Post  
Old July 20th 05, 05:22 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Default Tunnel damage

"Brimstone" wrote:
Patrick SIU wrote:
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote:
How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the
rear four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail
towards King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would
have been the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at
least one of them should have been able to be removed by rail.

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3)


Yes.


Then how come he said "Three-car" after "four-car"?


  #9   Report Post  
Old July 20th 05, 11:13 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
Default Tunnel damage

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:42 +0100 (BST),
(Colin
Rosenstiel) wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

Half of the train at KX has been removed to Cockfosters depot while
I am told the Edgware Road carriages were being taken away by low
loader today having been craned out.


How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the

rear
four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail towards
King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would have been
the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at least one of
them should have been able to be removed by rail.


On the Picc Line I am sure our internal report said 4 cars. I assume
this was done to get the maximum amount of movable cars out of the way.
I appreciate this defies normal "logic" but we are not dealing with a
normal situation.

The Circle Line removal was explained to me as all cars being winched
out. Obviously only the one damaged car was taken out - as seen on TV.
I assume that the others have been pulled clear to allow the damaged

car
out. I've not seen a report on what has moved and to where re the
remaining Edgware Rd / Aldgate trains.


So there's been no report, internal or otherwise, which specifies the
numbers of the cars which were hit by the bombs (see my earlier post
about stock damage)?

--
Colin Rosenstiel
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 21st 05, 04:23 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,995
Default Tunnel damage

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:13 +0100 (BST), (Colin
Rosenstiel) wrote:

So there's been no report, internal or otherwise, which specifies the
numbers of the cars which were hit by the bombs (see my earlier post
about stock damage)?


I've not seen anything but that doesn't mean such information does not
exist. I am not on the recovery team.
--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'Structrual damage' at Baker Street AM Friday 11th Feb Martin J London Transport 4 February 14th 05 06:10 PM
Tube ear damage John Rowland London Transport 12 July 19th 04 10:00 PM
Tunnel routes Question [email protected] London Transport 3 August 9th 03 10:09 AM
More heat damage Matthew Malthouse London Transport 2 August 7th 03 07:41 AM
Tunnel Maps Christine London Transport 24 August 1st 03 11:41 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017