Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
Well, at the Saturday press conference two days after the bombing Tim
O'Toole stated that the Piccadilly line tunnel was intact, Just from what I've seen in the media and by the consequences of the bombs it seems to me that they weren't all that powerful (otherwise the carriages would have completely annihalated and no one inside would have survived) so I suspect damage to the tunnels (which are built a lot stronger than the trains) is probably limited to damaged cabling and track. B2003 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
Boltar wrote: Well, at the Saturday press conference two days after the bombing Tim O'Toole stated that the Piccadilly line tunnel was intact, Just from what I've seen in the media and by the consequences of the bombs it seems to me that they weren't all that powerful (otherwise the carriages would have completely annihalated and no one inside would have survived) so I suspect damage to the tunnels (which are built a lot stronger than the trains) is probably limited to damaged cabling and track. B2003 Cabling can be a problem though. It was on the news a while ago. The reason the Northern Line took so long to get working last time that had an accident was that they didn't have any up to date wiring diagrams. If the Piccadilly line is the same then that could take a while too. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote:
How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the rear four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail towards King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would have been the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at least one of them should have been able to be removed by rail. -- Colin Rosenstiel Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
Patrick SIU wrote:
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote: How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the rear four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail towards King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would have been the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at least one of them should have been able to be removed by rail. -- Colin Rosenstiel Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3) Yes. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
"Brimstone" wrote:
Patrick SIU wrote: "Colin Rosenstiel" wrote: How many cars were removed by rail Earlier reports said that the rear four cars of the Piccadilly train would be removed by rail towards King's Cross while presumably the rear three car unit would have been the simplest. The Circle trains are two-car units so at least one of them should have been able to be removed by rail. -- Colin Rosenstiel Aren't Picc trains six cars? (3-3) Yes. Then how come he said "Three-car" after "four-car"? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tunnel damage
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:13 +0100 (BST), (Colin
Rosenstiel) wrote: So there's been no report, internal or otherwise, which specifies the numbers of the cars which were hit by the bombs (see my earlier post about stock damage)? I've not seen anything but that doesn't mean such information does not exist. I am not on the recovery team. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'Structrual damage' at Baker Street AM Friday 11th Feb | London Transport | |||
Tube ear damage | London Transport | |||
Tunnel routes Question | London Transport | |||
More heat damage | London Transport | |||
Tunnel Maps | London Transport |