Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
Clive D. W. Feather wrote: In article m, Martin Underwood writes Ask a resident which county they live in and they'll say "Berkshire" not "Windsor and Maidenhead" or "Bracknell Forest". According to Simon Gardner who regularly posts in uk.local.thames-valley, the strictly correct, hair-splitting answer to the question would be "I don't" - because Bracknell Forest etc aren't even counties - they are Unitary Authorities. I haven't checked the case of Bracknell Forest, but the correct titles of two other unitary authorities are the County of Peterborough and the County of Southend-on-Sea. I don't think that's strictly true. There is a County of Southend-on-Sea (and also a County of Thurrock), and those areas are no longer part of the (administrative) county of Essex. But these new counties do not have councils. The relevant unitary authority for Southend is still Southend-on-Sea Borough Council. Indeed there is no mention of the "County of Southend-on-Sea" on www.southend.gov.uk . And the situation is similar for Peterborough. The functions of Cambridgeshire County Council in respect of Peterborough were transferred to the *city* council, i.e. the unitary authority. I don't know why it was necessary to create these new formal counties. Presumably the original legislation creating the unitary authorities was botched. Why didn't they just re-create County Boroughs? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes The 1990s unitaries were made to fit in with post-1972 local government legislation which didn't include County Boroughs. They are essentially the same though modern unitaries are not the same as the old County Boroughs in a number of respects. Peterborough shares a number of services with Cambridgeshire including the Fire and Rescue service, Police, Waste Disposal arrangements, structure plan and a Lord Lieutenant. The old county borough sometimes shared functions with the counties around them, too. Smethwick, a county borough since 1907, shared a police force with Staffordshire pre 1966. Solihull and Warwickshire shared a children's home during Solihull's brief period as a County Borough (1966-74) and I think that Brighton and the two Sussexes shared a common police force, too (but I might be wrong on that one). They *all* shared Lords Lieutenant, since that was (and is) an office pertaining to the geographical (now "ceremonial" county, rather than the administrative one. Even Birmingham was ultimately under the Lord Lieutenant of Warwickshire and Manchester under Lancashire, although they were obviously self governing in all respects. -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG: zone 2 to zone 1 via zone 3 | London Transport | |||
South Eastern expand High Speed Service | London Transport | |||
When do NR tickets include tube travel? | London Transport | |||
Unitary Authorities (was Will Travelcard Zone 6 ever expand to include | London Transport | |||
Will Travelcard Zone 6 ever expand to include Dartford stattion? | London Transport |