PhilD wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
I think it will be an ELL siding and disconnected from the District Line,
but I might have got that the wrong way around.


The ELL signalling plan I've seen has no connection at the ELL end, so
I think it will be the other way round.

On the other hand, the revised Signalling Plan I've seen retains the
curve, primarily for Engineering Trains to access LUL from NR metals.

Trains to be serviced at new depot at New Cross Gate, heavy work likely
to go to Selhurst.

regards
HN28

On 12 Feb 2006 08:23:52 -0800, wrote:

PhilD wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
I think it will be an ELL siding and disconnected from the District Line,
but I might have got that the wrong way around.


The ELL signalling plan I've seen has no connection at the ELL end, so
I think it will be the other way round.

On the other hand, the revised Signalling Plan I've seen retains the
curve, primarily for Engineering Trains to access LUL from NR metals.

Trains to be serviced at new depot at New Cross Gate, heavy work likely
to go to Selhurst.

regards
HN28


LUL will remin the Infrastructure Controller for East London Line,
providing both infrastructure and signalling over the existing Line.

Retention f St Mary's Curve therefore makes sense....


Rob.
--
rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk