| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#26
August 18th 07, 08:00 AM
posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london,uk.transport.air
|
|||
|
|||
"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message ... Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: Brimstone wrote: NM wrote: tim..... wrote: "NM" wrote in message ... tim..... wrote: "allan tracy" wrote in message oups.com... Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is usefully situated. Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live there. Hum, when was the mainline railway built? Relevence? Why would they build a mainline railway to an area with no people in it. tim To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike. Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road. Then they must have moved it since I was a kid. Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that the two don't get close and even cross in one or two places between London and Reading.) Which is what I said in the first place. You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates that the two are close to each other for most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of locations, they don't even get close. More or less, all the implications are your fantasies. That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice. Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion technique, Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five year old memories of a limited area. OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question soley posed with trolling in mind. I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now you can't handle it when found out. Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying **** what you think. Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling around trying straighten them says enough. Dream on. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| "Heathrow and Gatwick airports: Ministers mull rail link" (twixt the two) | London Transport | |||
| Two free exhibitions, London underground station plans, past and future | London Transport | |||
| Works unit only exit with hidden office on M11. What is it? | London Transport | |||
| Kings Cross Thameslink & "London Terminals" | London Transport | |||
| Kings Cross Thameslink & "London Terminals" | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
