Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Signs and portents (well, a map, anyway)
It does... but it's far less prominent now. The trains don't have it
written on them any more and announcements etc. don't mention it. Besides which, once the Thameslink work is all finished, the thameslink route could mean trains to any number of destinations rather then the fairly simple route it refers to at the moment. All of which will pass through Farringdon, though. And vice versa, every train which passes through Farringdon will be on the Thameslink route. Makes no difference, the name "Thameslink" refers to Brighton / Sutton to Bedford. Trains going to Peterborough have never been called Thameslink or part of the Thameslink route, so still calling it Thameslink will be confusing, especially since the operator won't be called Thameslink either. Pasting over that sign was a very sensible thing to do. Best Wishes, LEWIS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How well off are London's tube drivers and why are they striking? | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
Northern line stock not wearing well | London Transport | |||
"Service running well" | London Transport |