On Jan 3, 5:53 pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 3 Jan, 17:02, "Clive." wrote:

It is unfair that London pensioners should be able to use the public
transport in other cities (buses) but non-Londoners cannot make use of
the tube which is standard PT in London, as pensioners down there can.
--
Clive.

Free local bus travel across England for those 60+ and yet you have a
gripe!
....
LOROL!! I thought that was very funny as well... staring intently at a
gift horse's teeth!
It reminds me of the parable of the workers in the vineyards.

In message
of
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 02:32:03 in uk.transport.london, Mizter T
writes

[snip]

Are they really such silly rules? Would you let all English pensioners
use the railway network across England for example?

I believe pensioner train travel has been free in the Irish Republic for
some time. I do not know what the limitations of the scheme are.

I am uncomfortable with the traffic implications of free travel.
--
Walter Briscoe

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On 4 Jan, 00:39, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,

(Clive.) wrote:
It is unfair that London pensioners should be able to use the
public transport in other cities (buses) but non-Londoners cannot
make use of the tube which is standard PT in London, as pensioners
down there can.

Blame the Government. They have made the silly rules on this free bus
scheme.

Are they really such silly rules? Would you let all English pensioners
use the railway network across England for example?

TBH, I wouldn't give free travel. It encourages wasteful journeys and
distorts modal splits. I would give discounts to reflect that they are
filling empty off-peak seats and better pensions so that pensioners can
make their own choices.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message
...
In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On 4 Jan, 00:39, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,


Blame the Government. They have made the silly rules on this free bus
scheme.

Are they really such silly rules? Would you let all English pensioners
use the railway network across England for example?

TBH, I wouldn't give free travel. It encourages wasteful journeys and
distorts modal splits. I would give discounts to reflect that they are
filling empty off-peak seats and better pensions so that pensioners can
make their own choices.


There's a real possibility that the free bus travel will wipe out daytime
train travel by the over 60s in some rural areas. I'm sure one of the
regional rail companies has already found this. South Wales perhaps?

By the way, how do TfL calculate/reimburse the travel costs of Freedom Pass
holders on National Rail in the London area?

Paul S

Walter Briscoe wrote:
In message
of
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 02:32:03 in uk.transport.london, Mizter T
writes

[snip]

Are they really such silly rules? Would you let all English pensioners
use the railway network across England for example?

I believe pensioner train travel has been free in the Irish Republic for
some time. I do not know what the limitations of the scheme are.

ICBW, but I seem to remember reading that the Republic of Ireland has a
significantly younger population than the UK - more yoofs and fewer
wrinklies than here. It might make a difference.

I am uncomfortable with the traffic implications of free travel.

Paying lots for a ticket for a long trip, then having to give up the
seat to a miserable old git who is riding round in circles because it is
free. Shades of teenagers struggling to do school work in public
libraries full of half-mad old biddies shouting to each other.

--
Arthur "tolerance" Figgis

In message , Paul Scott
writes

By the way, how do TfL calculate/reimburse the travel costs of Freedom
Pass holders on National Rail in the London area?

It's worth pointing out that 60+ residents in the West Midlands get
local train travel, too, as do those in some (but not all) other PTE
areas.

As the new scheme is for free *bus* travel, this is all it gives. Some
local authorities will continue to finance extra benefits such as
train/metro travel but these are funded locally and are not part of the
national scheme.

I am a believer in free local travel for older people, not as a
poverty-relieving measure but as a tangible "gift" from society to
someone who has attained a certain age. A bit like a more useful
version of the traditional retirement clock, if that's not too fanciful.

I do however, see some *very* problematic consequences of this in some
areas for demographic reasons; Blackpool and Torquay spring to mind.
(Notwithstanding the above, will the scheme give free bus travel in
Blackpool to "visiting" 60+ people but exclude the trams?)

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:32:28 -0000, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

There's a real possibility that the free bus travel will wipe out daytime
train travel by the over 60s in some rural areas. I'm sure one of the
regional rail companies has already found this. South Wales perhaps?

Before the current scheme went live, Stagecoach were planning to
increase capacity on some south coast services, on the expectation
that there would be a transfer from paid-for rail to free bus. The 700
service between Brighton and Portsmouth has seen considerable
enhancement in frequency.

Just how much transfer there has been between modes does not seem to
have been studied, or if it has, the results have not been published.

Personally, on the odd occasions when I wish to go to Brighton, I now
walk to the end of the lane and catch the bus, rather than drive to
the Park and Ride, or catch the train, having driven to the station
and paid to park.
--
Terry Harper
Website Coordinator, The Omnibus Society
http://www.omnibussoc.org

In message , Ian Jelf
writes
I am a believer in free local travel for older people, not as a
poverty-relieving measure but as a tangible "gift" from society to
someone who has attained a certain age.
I find this very offensive. I've paid full tax and N.I. All my life,
why should I now be a second class citizen to a "Londoner"?
--
Clive.

Clive. wrote:
In message , Ian Jelf
writes
I am a believer in free local travel for older people, not as a
poverty-relieving measure but as a tangible "gift" from society to
someone who has attained a certain age.
I find this very offensive. I've paid full tax and N.I. All my
life, why should I now be a second class citizen to a "Londoner"?

Because your council has not opted to fund free travel on local trains
for you, whereas those in London have. It's called local democracy. It
means your council tax is lower. Some people might regard that as an
advantage.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

In message , Walter Briscoe
writes

I believe pensioner train travel has been free in the Irish Republic
for some time. I do not know what the limitations of the scheme are.

Age 66+ in the republic (compared with 60+ for the bus pass scheme in
England). As I recall, life expectancy in the republic is almost 2 years
less than that in England, and the average age is almost 3 years less.

All of which combines to make such a scheme much more viable in the
republic than in England.
--
Paul Terry