Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 09:28:54 on Sat, 10 May 2008, TheOneKEA remarked: Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off. It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little improvement? Probably because the disruption is creating capacity for which demand already exists. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if the entire Underground/NR complex is just as busy after the LU northern ticket hall, direct links from Midland Road LL and the KX western ticket hall/ piazza works are finished - it would prove that the improvements were done about 5-10 years too late. It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more ticket office positions? -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 5:36*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:28:54 on Sat, 10 May 2008, TheOneKEA remarked: Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. *I just hope the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off. It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little improvement? Probably because the disruption is creating capacity for which demand already exists. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if the entire Underground/NR complex is just as busy after the LU northern ticket hall, direct links from Midland Road LL and the KX western ticket hall/ piazza works are finished - it would prove that the improvements were done about 5-10 years too late. It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more ticket office positions? That reminds me of a Two Ronnies joke about post offices. "We all know the situation where there are four counters and three of them are closed. Well, in future there will be twelve counters, and eleven of them will be closed." I arrived a Kings Cross from oop north in the evening a few months back and needed to put some Oyster credit on for one journey home. The ticket office was closed, so I stood in a long queue for a machine that refused to take my money. A member of staff had a few attempts at trying to get it to accept the perfectly good note and then told me that there was a problem with that machine and I must now go and stand in another long queue. I asked why he and the other staff present didn't just open the ticket office, which could deal with it easily, but they were all far too busy running from queue to queue, helping punters who were having problems with crappily-maintained machines, to answer my question. I can't remember the exact hour, but the station was open and busy, with lots of staff dealing very inefficiently with punters who were desperately trying to hand over money. Why couldn't they open the ticket office? Is it any wonder that some people end up travelling without paying? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 May, 17:36, Roland Perry wrote:
It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more ticket office positions? If the bottleneck is station capacity, which it is, then opening more ticket office positions would be an expensive way of making things worse. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 May, 17:36, Roland Perry wrote:
It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more ticket office positions? I seem to recall you saying in a previous post that the lines to the TVMs are very long. I would imgaine that this situation is exacerbated by people who are not sure how to use them. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 02:23:56 on Mon, 12 May 2008, John B remarked: It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more ticket office positions? If the bottleneck is station capacity, which it is, then opening more ticket office positions would be an expensive way of making things worse. Only if the queues mean that people decide not to travel [by tube]. Otherwise the rate of people joining and leaving the queue are roughly the same, and has no effect on the instantaneous throughput. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A RIGHT ROYAL GIVEAWAY: RYANAIR TO HAND OUT FREE FLIGHTS TO LONDONERS! | London Transport | |||
The tube strike is right! | London Transport | |||
The tube strike is right! | London Transport | |||
Unenforceable banned right turn in Highgate London | London Transport | |||
Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it | London Transport |