London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old August 1st 09, 06:40 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Tube to Battersea

In article
,

(nospam_lonelytraveller_nospam) wrote:

On 1 Aug, 17:45, wrote:
(nospam_lonelytraveller_nospam) wrote:
I heard that they were originally planning to take the Waterloo
& City

How would an extension get out of Waterloo?


It already does, the sidings just beyond the station are actually SE
of the station - just above "knit london" on this google map :

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&so...sv=169c&sll=51
..501734,-0.111601&sspn=0.001626,0.003449&ie=UTF8&geocode=FV fbEQMdDkv-_w&spl
it=0

Note the convenient SE facing alley and then playground directly
opposite, and the S facing road beyond it.


So, you're proposing street running? It's almost at street level there.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

  #52   Report Post  
Old August 1st 09, 08:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Default Tube to Battersea

On 1 Aug, 19:40, wrote:
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&so...ps=3&jsv=169c&...
.501734,-0.111601&sspn=0.001626,0.003449&ie=UTF8&geocode=FV fbEQMdDkv-_w&spl
it=0

Note the convenient SE facing alley and then playground directly
opposite, and the S facing road beyond it.


So, you're proposing street running? It's almost at street level there.

Colin Rosenstiel


The key word is "almost". The tracks at City Thameslink are only HALF
a story below street level - that didn't mean they couldn't raise the
road and Ludgate Circus by half a floor to get round the problem.

Besides, it can be lowered. The tube has many many changes of height,
and the Waterloo and City certainly does - its not that far to the
river, but it lowers itself quickly enough to go under.

And with an extension, the depot itself can be moved - maybe to
somewhere more convenient like next to the actual mainline, with a
joining track, so that stock can be moved directly instead of by an
awkward arrangement of crane and truck. The former Necropolis station,
and the branch from the mainline to it, spring to mind as particularly
helpful, and fairly conveniently located.

Once the depot is moved, the track through its former location no
longer needs to be level - it can slope down, and there's enough space
through the location for the tracks to use get sufficiently below
street level before they reach a street.
  #53   Report Post  
Old August 1st 09, 09:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Tube to Battersea

In article
,

(nospam_lonelytraveller_nospam) wrote:

On 1 Aug, 19:40, wrote:


http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&so...sv=169c&....50
1734,-0.111601&sspn=0.001626,0.003449&ie=UTF8&geocode=FV fbEQMdDkv-_w&split=
0

Note the convenient SE facing alley and then playground directly
opposite, and the S facing road beyond it.


So, you're proposing street running? It's almost at street level
there.


The key word is "almost". The tracks at City Thameslink are only HALF
a story below street level - that didn't mean they couldn't raise the
road and Ludgate Circus by half a floor to get round the problem.

Besides, it can be lowered. The tube has many many changes of height,
and the Waterloo and City certainly does - its not that far to the
river, but it lowers itself quickly enough to go under.

And with an extension, the depot itself can be moved - maybe to
somewhere more convenient like next to the actual mainline, with a
joining track, so that stock can be moved directly instead of by an
awkward arrangement of crane and truck. The former Necropolis station,
and the branch from the mainline to it, spring to mind as particularly
helpful, and fairly conveniently located.

Once the depot is moved, the track through its former location no
longer needs to be level - it can slope down, and there's enough space
through the location for the tracks to use get sufficiently below
street level before they reach a street.


Hmm. Dream on, brother.

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tube to Battersea MIG London Transport 0 July 15th 09 08:33 PM
£26m deal for Battersea Park station TravelBot London Transport News 0 March 12th 06 07:40 PM
Battersea Park Tonight Chris! London Transport 1 November 5th 05 04:57 PM
Bus diversion due to closure of Battersea Bridge [email protected] London Transport 41 September 28th 05 02:16 PM
Battersea Power Station dan London Transport 8 October 13th 03 11:22 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017