Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
and Southern are NOT accepting FCC tickets.
There is not only a dispute withy drivers on the FCC Bedford - Brighton route. There is also a dispute between Southern and FCC about accepting FCC tickets on Southern services. Today I was at Gatwick having travelled down from Paddington via Farringdon. I got there OK. However on the return journey in the evening ALL of the FCC services northwards had been cancelled and my only option was to travel on Southern to Victoria, and then get the Circle Line to Paddington. But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. CJB. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CJB" wrote in message
... and Southern are NOT accepting FCC tickets. There is not only a dispute withy drivers on the FCC Bedford - Brighton route. There is also a dispute between Southern and FCC about accepting FCC tickets on Southern services. Today I was at Gatwick having travelled down from Paddington via Farringdon. That seems like a bit of a sacrifice - it's far quicker to travel via Victoria using the Bakerloo/Victoria lines. I got there OK. However on the return journey in the evening ALL of the FCC services northwards had been cancelled and my only option was to travel on Southern to Victoria, and then get the Circle Line to Paddington. Uh? Victoria and Bakerloo lines are *much* faster. Even a 36 or 436 bus would be faster. But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. I don't think there's any dispute. Which part of FCC ONLY do you fail to understand? Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. This will happen some time after Hell Freezes Over, or possibly if the Southern and Thameslink franchises are ever in the same hands again. OTOH it's quite difficult to buy a tix between London to Gatwick that give you flexibility of operator and London Terminal. AFAIAA the only options a a) An all-zone travelcard, or some combination of travelcard and boundary-zone extension ticket. b) Buy an ANY PERMITTED or NOT GATWICK EXPRESS ticket to/from Three Bridges instead. One slight piece of relief is that Gatwick Express now accept Southern tix from Victoria if there's a problem with services from there, e.g. a spate of fatalities on recent evenings. However, this cannot be taken for granted and you have to ask the train manager if the concession hasn't been announced. On one particularly chaotic evening I sneaked a ride with FCC to Brighton from Haywards Heath with a Southern only ticket, but I doubt I would have got much sympathy had FCC been checking tix. D A Stocks |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 6, 12:31*am, "David A Stocks" wrote:
But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. I don't think there's any dispute. Which part of FCC ONLY do you fail to understand? Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. This will happen some time after Hell Freezes Over, or possibly if the Southern and Thameslink franchises are ever in the same hands again. Not true, re the specific problem: a small amount of DfT head-knocking- together could make franchiseesa bit better at disregarding operator- specific restrictions in times of severe disruption. Obviously on the wider not-problem-but-whole-bloody-point of competing tickets, "hell freezes over" is the right timeframe. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John B" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 12:31 am, "David A Stocks" wrote: But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. I don't think there's any dispute. Which part of FCC ONLY do you fail to understand? Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. This will happen some time after Hell Freezes Over, or possibly if the Southern and Thameslink franchises are ever in the same hands again. Not true, re the specific problem: a small amount of DfT head-knocking- together could make franchiseesa bit better at disregarding operator- specific restrictions in times of severe disruption. Obviously on the wider not-problem-but-whole-bloody-point of competing tickets, "hell freezes over" is the right timeframe. Conditions of Carriage 43 says 43. Help from Train Companies if you are stranded If disruption caused by circumstances within the control of a Train Company or a Rail Service Company leaves you stranded before you have reached your destination and the Train Company whose trains you are entitled to use is unable to get you to that destination by other means, any Train Company which is in a position to help will, if it reasonably can, either arrange to get you to that destination, or provide overnight accommodation for you. So in this situation Southern already has a duty to take the passengers and then sort it out with FCC later. Peter Smyth |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 6, 7:21*pm, "Peter Smyth" wrote:
"John B" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 12:31 am, "David A Stocks" wrote: But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. I don't think there's any dispute. Which part of FCC ONLY do you fail to understand? Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. This will happen some time after Hell Freezes Over, or possibly if the Southern and Thameslink franchises are ever in the same hands again. Not true, re the specific problem: a small amount of DfT head-knocking- together could make franchiseesa bit better at disregarding operator- specific restrictions in times of severe disruption. Obviously on the wider not-problem-but-whole-bloody-point of competing tickets, "hell freezes over" is the right timeframe. Conditions of Carriage 43 says 43. Help from Train Companies if you are stranded If disruption caused by circumstances within the control of a Train Company or a Rail Service Company leaves you stranded before you have reached your destination and the Train Company whose trains you are entitled to use is unable to get you to that destination by other means, any Train Company which is in a position to help will, if it reasonably can, either arrange to get you to that destination, or provide overnight accommodation for you. So in this situation Southern already has a duty to take the passengers and then sort it out with FCC later. Peter Smyth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And I got a reply from FCC ... Customer Relations First Capital Connect PO Box 443 Plymouth PL4 6WP Tel: 0845 0264700 Fax: 0845 6769904 Website: www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk Ref: 4948531 Dear Mr CJ Brady Thank you for contacting us about the recent cancellation to our services. I am sorry to learn your recent journey with us between Gatwick and Farringdon was affected. I can appreciate how frustrating this must be and I am sorry for the inconvenience this has caused. While we always attempt to run the timetabled service, recently there have been a number of issues which have affected our usual service. A combination of factors has meant we have not had adequate driver availability; this has led to a significant number of cancellations although we have been working hard to ensure we operate with as little disruption as possible. One of the issues affecting Driver numbers involves introducing competency training on new trains and new routes which is stretching Driver availability. This has been compounded by Drivers not working rest days or overtime. This is not official action or even unofficial, but as is the case with many train operators, First Capital Connect relies on a certain amount of flexibility with drivers working a combination of overtime and rest days to operate the service. We hope to resolve the situation shortly but in the meantime you can claim for any delays that are thirty minutes or longer through the usual process. For more details, please pick up an application form from a member of our staff at any of our stations, or visit our website at www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk to download a claim form. I fully understand that as far as customer perception stands, there are too many problems at the moment. I can only apologise that your journey was affected but you have my assurance that we will do whatever it takes to get the service back on track. Regarding the use of First Capital Connect only tickets, I regret that these are only valid on our trains as they are cheaper tickets than any permitted. Southern also have a range of reduced price tickets that are only valid on their services. There are however tickets available that have no restrictions and can be used on either operator, these are marked 'any permitted', but are slightly more expensive. Once again thank you for contacting us about this matter. Yours sincerely Jackie Hampton Customer Relations Advisor First Capital Connect Limited. Registered in England & Wales No. 05281077. Registered office: 50 Eastbourne Terrace, Paddington, London, W2 6LX. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But now FCC are cancelling all trains from Cambridge to/from London at
the weekend ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8347363.stm Driver shortage to disrupt trains Rail services between West Norfolk and London will be replaced with buses on Sunday due to a shortage of drivers. First Capital Connect and Thameslink rely on staff working overtime and rest days to provide a seven-day service. A spokesman said a combination of sickness and training courses meant they would have to bus people to stations for connecting services. He said the priority was to get people to and from the Remembrance Sunday service in Whitehall. Passengers will be taken by bus to Cambridge to link up with other services. Drivers unavailable Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire passengers will be transported to Bedford where they can pick up Thameslink services. A spokesman said many drivers were not available or had declined to work. He said the company was "disappointed" Remembrance Sunday services would be among those to be disrupted. "We are continuing to work towards a resolution to these problems and to provide alternative transport where possible. "We regret any inconvenience this disruption will cause." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJB wrote on 06 November 2009 22:09:11 ...
But now FCC are cancelling all trains from Cambridge to/from London at the weekend ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8347363.stm Driver shortage to disrupt trains Rail services between West Norfolk and London will be replaced with buses on Sunday due to a shortage of drivers. First Capital Connect and Thameslink rely on staff working overtime and rest days to provide a seven-day service. In my view that is an unprofessional way to run a 7-day service, and should be outlawed by the DfT. The company is clearly not able to offer a reliable 7-day service if it doesn't employ sufficient people to staff it. What is the RMT's attitude to this, I wonder? Are they protecting their existing working members' overtime or seeking to get more (current or potential) members in employment? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Smyth" wrote in message ... "John B" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 12:31 am, "David A Stocks" wrote: But the b'stard Southern revenue protection officers wouldn't let me travel on my FCC only ticket. I had to pay again. I understand that the dispute about Southern accepting FCC tickets has been going on for quite a while. I don't think there's any dispute. Which part of FCC ONLY do you fail to understand? Its about time both management teams got together to sort this out once and for all. This will happen some time after Hell Freezes Over, or possibly if the Southern and Thameslink franchises are ever in the same hands again. Not true, re the specific problem: a small amount of DfT head-knocking- together could make franchiseesa bit better at disregarding operator- specific restrictions in times of severe disruption. Obviously on the wider not-problem-but-whole-bloody-point of competing tickets, "hell freezes over" is the right timeframe. Conditions of Carriage 43 says 43. Help from Train Companies if you are stranded If disruption caused by circumstances within the control of a Train Company or a Rail Service Company leaves you stranded before you have reached your destination and the Train Company whose trains you are entitled to use is unable to get you to that destination by other means, any Train Company which is in a position to help will, if it reasonably can, either arrange to get you to that destination, or provide overnight accommodation for you. So in this situation Southern already has a duty to take the passengers and then sort it out with FCC later. Peter Smyth More info on the FCC and tweets http://www.firstcrapitalconnect.co.uk/ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Smyth wrote
Conditions of Carriage 43 says 43. Help from Train Companies if you are stranded If disruption caused by circumstances within the control of a Train Company or a Rail Service Company leaves you stranded before you have reached your destination and the Train Company whose trains you are entitled to use is unable to get you to that destination by other means, any Train Company which is in a position to help will, if it reasonably can, either arrange to get you to that destination, or provide overnight accommodation for you. So in this situation Southern already has a duty to take the passengers and then sort it out with FCC later. I am not sure that CoC 43 means what you think. "stranded before you have reached your destination" need not include "unable to start your journey", hence the reference to overnight accommodation, nor is it really clear that it includes inability to start a return jouney with a return ticket. Also the drafter of CoC 43 probably didn't envisage the case, now common, of buying two singles for a return journey. -- Mike D |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Smyth" wrote in message
... So in this situation Southern already has a duty to take the passengers and then sort it out with FCC later. However, SN don't run trains on the Thameslink route. They definitely do *not* have a duty to carry passengers to Farringdon, especially a passenger who ought to have purchased a ticket valid (and travelled) via Victoria in the first place. SN have various discount offers (especially for tix purchased online) which would make such a ticket considerably cheaper than the route the OP chose. D A Stocks |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
First Capital Connect Inspectors strike again ! Allegedly | London Transport | |||
First Capital Connect strike ... | London Transport | |||
Oyster pads on First Capital Connect ticket machines | London Transport | |||
First Capital Connect fare rise last weekend? | London Transport | |||
Heathrow Connect - can't connect !! | London Transport |