Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 May 2010 16:48:28 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. Sunil"
wrote: Worcester Park also has the white on black signage, but lacking zone info (the the others like this being Hampton Court and New Malden). http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...ew_signage.JPG Looks fairly professional. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To reply put my first name before the at. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 21, 3:16*pm, Neil Williams wrote: On Thu, 20 May 2010 16:48:28 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. Sunil" wrote: Worcester Park also has the white on black signage, but lacking zone info (the the others like this being Hampton Court and New Malden). http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...ew_signage.JPG Looks fairly professional. Wonder if the colour scheme - specifically the inverted white on navy blue (for that's what it is right - it's not black I don't think) is intended to discourage casual graffitists and taggers, what with the lack of empty white space? Or maybe it just provides the best contrast. What's the font? It looks like the SWT house font to me, which is why I wonder whether this is the embodiment of a new national standard... Or maybe the standard is rather loose, merely specifying white on navy blue text, but the font is of the TOCs choosing. Looking back at the Surbiton examples in the first post of this thread, it is indeed the same font - and it's not the classic (BR) Rail Alphabet font either. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Mizter T writes What's the font? It looks like the SWT house font to me, Which I think is plain old Arial Bold, although not a bad choice because it is a font recommended for clarity, particularly for people with visual impairments. -- Paul Terry |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 May, 00:52, "Dr. Sunil" wrote:
On 20 May, 18:57, MIG wrote: On 20 May, 14:43, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 19 May, 21:14, MIG wrote: On 16 May, 23:07, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Spyke" wrote in message ... On 14/05/2010 16:36, Theo Markettos wrote: Dr. *wrote: In recent months, South West Trains have changed a lot of signage on the platforms at their stations in the Oystercard Area (though not all of them). Noticed new signs (so far) at Queenstown Road, Vauxhall, Earlsfield, Raynes Park, New Malden, Norbiton, Twickenham, Surbiton and Feltham. But I have yet to check out the Hounslow loop, Hampton/ Fulwell, Thames Ditton and the Chessington and Ewell West branches in recent months though. Yes, I noticed that. *When viewed from a distance it's easy to mistake them for platform numbers. *I suppose regular users will get used to them. Theo They are rolling out the new white-on-blue style across their whole network, not just in the zones. Aldershot has them as well (without Fare zone label obviously). White on navy blue is supposedly going to be being rolled out nationally, not just on SWT. It was one of the decisions following the stations report prepared for the last Transport Secretary, the idea being that signage will no longer be changed with franchise renewals. Paul Due to this discussion I've now noticed a new style of external station sign, which incorporates a BR arrows of indecision in white on red and, in a panel at the bottom, the station name in white on black*. *or very dark blue or charcoal or whatever. I know the signage is London Overground, but the National Rail like this one at Penge West?http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ge_West_stn_en... No; the one I noticed recently was more like the white on red BR sign that can also be seen in the picture, but with a white on black station name below the red panel. *So the symbol is vertically above the name, and bigger than the name. I'll see if I can get a snap of one somewhere.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...tn_east_entran... You mean just like the above but the lettering colours reversed?- Here's what I mean. Pardon the crappy picture. I couldn't get the Thing to work, and then as I was giving up the shutter went off. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fenny.jpg |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 21, 8:40*pm, MIG wrote: On 21 May, 00:52, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 20 May, 18:57, MIG wrote: On 20 May, 14:43, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 19 May, 21:14, MIG wrote: Due to this discussion I've now noticed a new style of external station sign, which incorporates a BR arrows of indecision in white on red and, in a panel at the bottom, the station name in white on black*. *or very dark blue or charcoal or whatever. I know the signage is London Overground, but the National Rail like this one at Penge West? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...nce_2010. JPG No; the one I noticed recently was more like the white on red BR sign that can also be seen in the picture, but with a white on black station name below the red panel. *So the symbol is vertically above the name, and bigger than the name. I'll see if I can get a snap of one somewhere. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..._entrance..JPG You mean just like the above but the lettering colours reversed?- Here's what I mean. *Pardon the crappy picture. *I couldn't get the Thing to work, and then as I was giving up the shutter went off. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fenny.jpg That looks very much like the London Midland house font to me - whether the black backing is explained by that being the LM house style too (see their printed publicity or website for example), or because there's some edict that station nameboards and totems won't carry TOC logos any more I dunno. But if there is such an edict then it' would appear to be somewhat loose. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:40:50 -0700 (PDT), MIG
wrote: Here's what I mean. Pardon the crappy picture. I couldn't get the Thing to work, and then as I was giving up the shutter went off. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fenny.jpg That's the white-on-black London Midland signage. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To reply put my first name before the at. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 May, 20:03, Neil Williams
wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:40:50 -0700 (PDT), MIG wrote: Here's what I mean. *Pardon the crappy picture. *I couldn't get the Thing to work, and then as I was giving up the shutter went off. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fenny.jpg That's the white-on-black London Midland signage. Yes; that's what I would have assumed if it hadn't been for the discussion. But that particular style/combination is not something I have noticed till recently, even on LM. Maybe I just haven't noticed. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT), MIG
wrote: Yes; that's what I would have assumed if it hadn't been for the discussion. But that particular style/combination is not something I have noticed till recently, even on LM. Maybe I just haven't noticed. You probably haven't ![]() signage are in that style (that might well now be all LM stations full stop - even Polesworth has had it!) Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To reply put my first name before the at. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
South West Trains diverted at Wimbledon? | London Transport | |||
South West Trains season ticket price finder | London Transport | |||
Regulation Of Off-Peak Rail Fares Following South West Trains Increases | London Transport | |||
South West Trains retain franchise | London Transport | |||
South West Trains over District Line south of East Putney | London Transport |