Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robin9" wrote in message ... HoxtonOvergroundSurvey;136794 Wrote: Hello, I am conducting research on the impact of the Hoxton Overground station since it opened in 2010. The study is part of the requirements for the Masters in Urban Planning from the University of Amsterdam. I would like to ask you a few questions about how the station has impacted your connection to the community and the city. By taking the survey, you either have to live within the boundaries of Hoxton or use the Hoxton Overground station semi-frequently. You will find a link to the survey below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/hoxtonovergroundsurvey For the purpose of this survey, the borders of Hoxton will be: The Regents Canal in the north, City Road/ Wharf Road in the west, Old Street/Hackney Road/Columbia Road in the south and Queensbridge Road in the East. No personal information will be collected in this survey and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please feel free to send this to anyone you think might be interested and fits the criteria. Thank you so much for you time, Patrick I hope you receive a response from every adult resident of Hoxton. In the days of British Rail there was no station at Hoxton. Trains ran non-stop between Broad Street and Dalston Junction. Before the Second World War there had been additional stations. Mildmay Park was closed in 1934, Haggerston was closed in May, 1940 and Shoreditch was closed in October 1940. When the War ended, it was decided not to reopen these stations, almost certainly because they had been so lightly patronised previously. But so where many others on what is now "the overground" Times have changed and these stations are now well used (again). tim |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-04-30 15:59:09 +0000, Robin9 said:
Quantify "well used". Figures were posted above. I live close by the line, midway between Dalston and Haggerston, and if you want reassurance I can tell you than there is much development in the area and many new flats, businesses and an influx of young people. The stations will get busier but are already fairly well used but many outlying stations have quiet periods off peak. The line got much busier when the Highbury link was opened and even busier now with Clapham. E. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:55:03 +0100
eastender wrote: On 2013-04-30 15:59:09 +0000, Robin9 said: Quantify "well used". Figures were posted above. I live close by the line, midway between Dalston and Haggerston, and if you want reassurance I can tell you than there is much development in the area and many new flats, businesses and an influx of young people. The stations will get busier but are already fairly well used but many outlying stations have quiet periods off peak. The line got much busier when the Highbury link was opened and even busier now with Clapham. It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. -- Spud |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! -- Mike Bristow |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013 13:15:35 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote: In article , d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. Was it? I can't see the rationale behind that. Seems a bit mean spirited. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! No doubt, but it could be even more popular and take some strain off the tube. If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. -- Spud |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:50:20 +0100
Paul Corfield wrote: needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. Figures. Industry first, passengers second, what a surprise. Still, I suppose if you're a City bound commuter and you don't mind a walk you can always get off at Hoxton going south or Whitechapel going north to avoid zone 1. I agree it is rather leisurely but I think the low running speeds and padded timetables are how the impressive performance stats are achieved. If everything was scheduled "on a knife edge" then it would take almost nothing to cause the service to run late and be delayed. But it would only be delayed on paper. It would still generally be quicker in practice. There are quite long stretches where 40mph is easily achievable with the acceleration of the trains. It seems a bit of a cop out to run them so slow. -- Spud |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013\05\01 15:50, Paul Corfield wrote:
Yes it was. The rationale was to prevent astraction of revenue from TOCs running into London Bridge and Cannon St where a Z1 ticket is needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. I don't like the fact that the ELL has been placed on Z1 as it spoils the Z23 orbital concept but I am pleased we actually got the line built. They could make Shoreditch Zone 1 for entering or exiting, but Zone 2 for passing through. BTW, I still can't believe that they didn't just call that station "Shoreditch". The walk from the old station to the new one is about the same as the walk from Angel's old entrance to new one, but they didn't feel the need to rename Angel. And SHS is not in the High Street anyway. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ELL extension - Hoxton/Haggerstown. | London Transport | |||
The infamous West London Tram survey | London Transport | |||
motorcycle crash survey | London Transport | |||
RESULTS: The Grand uk.transport.london Geographical Survey | London Transport | |||
The Grand uk.transport.london Geographical Survey | London Transport |