![]() |
Overground down again
In message , at 11:06:45 on Fri, 13
Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: I don't do formal jackets as I get quite hot so the first thing I would do on walking in the office is take it off. You need to look into lightweight suits/jackets. One type doesn't fit all weathers, and I reckon at least four are required to cope with the different seasons. And I've never really understood high heels on women, they don't really do anything for me, just strike me as a bit impractical and silly. Apparently they "do things" for other men, which is why the women wear them. -- Roland Perry |
Overground down again
On 2015-03-13 12:40:35 +0000, Roland Perry said:
You need to look into lightweight suits/jackets Or just not wear a suit, which works for most employers these days. Apparently they "do things" for other men, which is why the women wear them. I wonder what proportion. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
Overground down again
In message , at 13:26:16 on Fri, 13
Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: You need to look into lightweight suits/jackets Or just not wear a suit, which works for most employers these days. The only employer I have to impress is myself. On the other hand I do what I can, to fail to unimpress the people I'm working with. I went to a quite serious meeting in London yesterday and was in two minds whether or not to wear a suit and tie. The decision was a suit but no tie, and the result was that of the men in the meeting: the chair and one other attendee were wearing a suit and a tie, and myself and another were wearing a suit and no tie. Two other men were wearing something more casual, which in the case of the most casual was commented by other attendees on in a jokey, but not necessarily positive, way. Had the meeting been at the UN in Geneva (or somewhere similar), all the men would have been wearing suit and tie - except a very few wearing ethnic costume, which I don't at all disagree with, because a suit and tie is precisely *my* ethnic costume. But I draw a line at the bowler hat, just as the Aussies don't turn up with corks dangling from their hats. Apparently they "do things" for other men, which is why the women wear them. I wonder what proportion. The men or the women? Probably around 75% in both cases. -- Roland Perry |
Overground down again
On 2015-03-13 13:50:02 +0000, Roland Perry said:
In message , at 13:26:16 on Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: You need to look into lightweight suits/jackets Or just not wear a suit, which works for most employers these days. The only employer I have to impress is myself. On the other hand I do what I can, to fail to unimpress the people I'm working with. I went to a quite serious meeting in London yesterday and was in two minds whether or not to wear a suit and tie. The decision was a suit but no tie I've noticed that Evan Davis does the same now on Newsnight. As the style police have said, "Even a good suit looks cheap without a tie." E. |
Overground down again
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:56:40 +0000, eastender
wrote: On 2015-03-13 13:50:02 +0000, Roland Perry said: In message , at 13:26:16 on Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: You need to look into lightweight suits/jackets Or just not wear a suit, which works for most employers these days. The only employer I have to impress is myself. On the other hand I do what I can, to fail to unimpress the people I'm working with. I went to a quite serious meeting in London yesterday and was in two minds whether or not to wear a suit and tie. The decision was a suit but no tie I've noticed that Evan Davis does the same now on Newsnight. As the style police have said, "Even a good suit looks cheap without a tie." He wears a tie some days -- perhaps it depends on who he'll be interviewing? I don't think he was much of a tie wearer before getting that job, and judging by his tweets, he was in two minds about whether to wear one at all. Didn't Paxo also occasionally appear tie-less? |
Overground down again
On 2015-03-13 13:50:02 +0000, Roland Perry said:
The decision was a suit but no tie, and the result was that of the men in the meeting: the chair and one other attendee were wearing a suit and a tie, and myself and another were wearing a suit and no tie. Two other men were wearing something more casual, which in the case of the most casual was commented by other attendees on in a jokey, but not necessarily positive, way. Convention no doubt, but I totally fail to understand why an ill-fitting piece of old fashioned dress and a bit of fabric constricting your breathing is superior to, say, a neat company-branded polo shirt or a short-sleeved shirt without tie, and a pair of chinos. Maybe I should live in the US. Or Hoxton :) Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
Overground down again
In message , at 17:08:13 on Fri, 13
Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: The decision was a suit but no tie, and the result was that of the men in the meeting: the chair and one other attendee were wearing a suit and a tie, and myself and another were wearing a suit and no tie. Two other men were wearing something more casual, which in the case of the most casual was commented by other attendees on in a jokey, but not necessarily positive, way. Convention no doubt, but I totally fail to understand why an ill-fitting piece of old fashioned dress My suits fit better than my other clothing. and a bit of fabric constricting your breathing It doesn't. is superior Looks smart and has lots of pockets. to, say, a neat company-branded polo shirt I don't have any of those branded with my company, and all the ones branded with other people's company have been over-used for my DIY escapades. or a short-sleeved shirt without tie, and a pair of chinos. That's what I'd wear as "smart casual", but not every meeting is appropriate for that. -- Roland Perry |
Overground down again
On 2015-03-13 17:21:20 +0000, Roland Perry said:
My suits fit better than my other clothing. No doubt you're the pinnacle of sartorial elegance. But most suit-wearers aren't, I observe. and a bit of fabric constricting your breathing It doesn't. It does for me. I absolutely hate having things tight round my neck. is superior Looks smart and has lots of pockets. Other clothes can look smart provided they are neat and properly ironed. or a short-sleeved shirt without tie, and a pair of chinos. That's what I'd wear as "smart casual", but not every meeting is appropriate for that. Indeed not, though I do wish business would grow up a bit and stop worrying about what people wear and worry more about what they do and say. Within reason of course. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
Overground down again
In message , at 18:19:15 on Fri, 13
Mar 2015, Neil Williams remarked: On 2015-03-13 17:21:20 +0000, Roland Perry said: My suits fit better than my other clothing. No doubt you're the pinnacle of sartorial elegance. But most suit-wearers aren't, I observe. and a bit of fabric constricting your breathing It doesn't. It does for me. I absolutely hate having things tight round my neck. Something's wrong if it's tight. is superior Looks smart and has lots of pockets. Other clothes can look smart provided they are neat and properly ironed. Look neat and tidy perhaps. There's a reason for the term "smart casual". or a short-sleeved shirt without tie, and a pair of chinos. That's what I'd wear as "smart casual", but not every meeting is appropriate for that. Indeed not, though I do wish business would grow up a bit and stop worrying about what people wear and worry more about what they do and say. Within reason of course. In the literal sense, a suit is a 'uniform' (everyone the same), which means to opposite of what you imply - ie everyone can express an opinion without people making prior judgements because of the way they dress. It's also a great leveller on price and availability - anyone can get the outfit (which will last for ages). And there's nothing more distracting than one person turning up in £500 worth of Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen impression. The first thought through many people's minds will be "did he get dressed in the dark and forgot to put on his cufflinks?" -- Roland Perry |
Overground down again
On 2015-03-14 12:05:03 +0000, Roland Perry said:
Something's wrong if it's tight. I'm only comfortable if it's so loose it looks untidy. And there's nothing more distracting than one person turning up in £500 worth of Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen impression. The first thought through many people's minds will be "did he get dressed in the dark and forgot to put on his cufflinks?" Only if they're really uptight about dress. But then I suppose Sir Alan's part of the IT industry was curiously formal compared with the rest of it. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk