Cast_Iron wrote:
Someone who sits on their backside at home however,
complaining about people who make their voice heard is
almost certainly "indolent and useless".

significant snippage

Cast_Iron wrote:
Did someone suggest your were indolent?



Mait001 wrote:
Yes: see the sentence above beginning "Someone who sits on
their backside....."

What a sensitive soul you are. Like most bullies, always ready to hand out
abuse to others but then takes a suggestion aimed at the world in general as
if it's a direct personal attack. You'd best go and find your Mummy's apron
to dry your tears.



What an idiot you are. You accuse me of being "indolent and useless", then you
ask a wholly otiose question "Did someone suggest your were indolent?" to which
the obvious answer is "yes", and you then accuse me of being "sensitive"
(although I do not take that to be anything but a compliment) and you then
launch into some abuse.

Your inability to read, accept a response that I have given, or to write in a
non-abusive way says far more about your character than mine. Apart from
calling you an idiot in this message, just how had I previously "bullied" or
"abused" you?

Why must you turn a discussion about someone in Parliament Square and his views
etc., which originated from the D.L.R. disruption thread, into a personal
argument? Are you incapable of arguing any issue without it becoming a personal
attack? Are you really so insecure?

Marc.

Mait001 wrote:
Cast_Iron wrote:
Someone who sits on their backside at home however,
complaining about people who make their voice heard is
almost certainly "indolent and useless".

significant snippage

Cast_Iron wrote:
Did someone suggest your were indolent?



Mait001 wrote:
Yes: see the sentence above beginning "Someone who sits on
their backside....."

What a sensitive soul you are. Like most bullies, always
ready to hand out abuse to others but then takes a
suggestion aimed at the world in general as if it's a
direct personal attack. You'd best go and find your
Mummy's apron to dry your tears.



What an idiot you are. You accuse me of being "indolent and
useless", then you ask a wholly otiose question "Did
someone suggest your were indolent?" to which the obvious
answer is "yes", and you then accuse me of being
"sensitive" (although I do not take that to be anything but
a compliment) and you then launch into some abuse.

Your inability to read, accept a response that I have
given, or to write in a non-abusive way says far more about
your character than mine. Apart from calling you an idiot
in this message, just how had I previously "bullied" or
"abused" you?

Why must you turn a discussion about someone in Parliament
Square and his views etc., which originated from the D.L.R.
disruption thread, into a personal argument? Are you
incapable of arguing any issue without it becoming a
personal attack? Are you really so insecure?

Marc.

I reserve personal attack for special people.

"Cast_Iron" wrote in message ...
Seems like you've got mental health problem's as well, you just don't know
it yet. Since when could we rely on politicians or the media for anything
objective? They're pursuing their own agenda's; this guy however has no axe
to grind.

How do you know?

Just because someone has such a problem doesn't make them wrong in their
views, nor does it make them a "retard" nor a "nutter". There are many
highly creative and intelligent people who suffer from mental health
problems. Grow up and stop confusing illness and inttelligence.

Oh spare me the all inclusive we're-all-the-same bull**** routine. Its quite
obvious the guy has problems , I've been there and seen him which IMO makes
his views worthless.

You can only use the police to shift him if he is commiting an offence.

He is commiting an offence , he's obstructing the pavement and casuing a mess
plus he's set up a residence/camp without permission. Laws such as these are
used to move gypsies on all the time , they could easily be used on him.

speech and peaceful protest. Having such a closed, narrow mind that you
dismiss the message because you disapprove of the messenger says more about
you that it does him.

Thats right , anyone who complains about people taking their freedoms too far is
immediately labelled as ignorant by people such as yourself. I'm sure if there
had been an "-ist" word for distriminating against nutters you'd have used it
on me. Maybe you should make one up while you do the Guardian crossword
over your muesli tommorow.

B2003

On 16 Sep 2003 01:40:57 -0700, (Boltar) wrote:

"Cast_Iron" wrote in message ...
Highly unlikely since by being there he is making himself unavailable for
work and would therefore have his Jobseekers Allowance stopped. It is
possible that he has health problems that causes potential employers not to
offer him a job.

Well he can't be too physically ill to be able to camp out rough for that
long. Mentally however its quite obvious he's not fireing on all cylinders
in which case why the hell would anybody be the slightest bit interested in
his opinion?

Are you talking about David Blaine?


Rob.
--
rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk

I reserve personal attack for special people.


In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to abuse. That's
fine, just don't expect your views to hold much weight or your services as an
advocate to be much employed.

Marc.

Mait001 wrote:
I reserve personal attack for special people.


In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort
to abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold
much weight or your services as an advocate to be much
employed.

Marc.

You were happy to abuse the bloke in Parliament Square, can't take it back?

(Mait001) wrote the following in:


I reserve personal attack for special people.


In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to
abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold much
weight or your services as an advocate to be much employed.

It seems that you're the one who resorts to abuse. Don't like someone's
views? Brand them mentally ill. Nice tactic.

--
message by Robin May, consumer of liquids
If bathroom means toilet in America, I'll have a shower please.

Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort.

"Robin May" wrote in message
...
(Mait001) wrote the following in:


I reserve personal attack for special people.


In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to
abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold much
weight or your services as an advocate to be much employed.

It seems that you're the one who resorts to abuse. Don't like someone's
views? Brand them mentally ill. Nice tactic.

Who do you believe accused who of being mentally ill?.

In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to
abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold much
weight or your services as an advocate to be much employed.

It seems that you're the one who resorts to abuse. Don't like someone's
views? Brand them mentally ill. Nice tactic.


I did not brand anyone mentally ill. I said he was unemployed or unemployable.
I made no judgement as to his mental state.

Marc.

"Cast_Iron" wrote the following in:



"Robin May" wrote in message
...
(Mait001) wrote the following in:


I reserve personal attack for special people.


In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to
abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold much
weight or your services as an advocate to be much employed.

It seems that you're the one who resorts to abuse. Don't like
someone's views? Brand them mentally ill. Nice tactic.

Who do you believe accused who of being mentally ill?.

I had believed Mait001 accused protesters of being mentally ill, but it
seems I was mistaken. There was an accusation of mental illness in this
thread but it was not made by Mait001 and was against the protestor at
Parliament Square, although he did express 'total agreement' with it.

That said, labeling someone as in some way deviant (e.g. drug addict,
mentally ill, criminal etc.) is a classic way of attacking and
attempting to invalidate someone's views without actually providing a
valid argument against them.

--
message by Robin May, consumer of liquids
If bathroom means toilet in America, I'll have a shower please.

Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort.