London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 07:40 AM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 650
Default Public transport - why?

On 24 Sep, 21:57, "Peter Hucker" wrote:
It's just not viable.

For a laugh (and because they just built a station next to my house) I decided to check the feasability of a train to work. *It takes twice as long and costs twice as much as by car. *(1.5 hours instead of 45 mins and 16.50 instead of 7.50)

Silly treehuggers.

Is this the same throughout the country? *I'm in central Scotland.


Nope. Train for me takes 1h05 - 1h20 depending on when I leave, car
takes 1h25 in good traffic

I also get to watch TV/read a book/reply to trolls while I'm on the
train. Either that or work, and hence leave early.

Also get to go to the pub after work

Cost wise train costs about £13 a day, car costs £11 a day in petrol
alone -- £45 a day in inland revenue mileage.

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 10:22 AM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 7
Default Public transport - why?

In article ,
August West writes:
For me, train takes 20 minutes, door to door; the car 45-60. Cost of
train: about fiver; just parking the car costs rather more than that.


Bus to work and back would be about GBP2.50 each way (depends on the driver
and which buses turn up). They've just allowed staff to have the student-
discount card, which gets half-fare on some buses. Working out the bus-fare
is extremely complicated and effectively non-deterministic. I can't help
thinking that the bus company must like it that way.

Car takes 12-18 minutes for 6.8 miles (excluding outliers like snow/ice/fog
and obstruction by accidents) which is a little bit more than a litre of fuel
for the trip. Car-parking at works costs ~50p/day. Considering I have the
car anyway, the timing and arithmetic is pretty clear.

I'm in central Scotland, too.


Likewise. Still getting to work by car. If I need to do _anything_ other
than just go to work and come back (bit of shopping, etc.), which I do maybe
one day a week) bus is a no-hoper.
--
SAm.
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 11:00 AM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Public transport - why?

In message , at 11:22:38 on Thu, 25 Sep
2008, Sam Nelson remarked:
If I need to do _anything_ other than just go to work and come back
(bit of shopping, etc.), which I do maybe one day a week) bus is a
no-hoper.


I can travel around on the bus all day for a shade over £2 (because I
have a pre-pay card) or £3 on a turn-up-and-go basis. Parking at the
station is £8 per day and you'd be lucky to find any parking in my city
centre (Nottingham) elsewhere for less than £2 per hour. I work from
home, and the parking there is free.
--
Roland Perry
  #6   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 12:43 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 264
Default Public transport - why?

Sam Nelson wrote:


For example, my office contains about 100 engineers, but there are
only 5 parking spaces for the two floors we are on. The ank & transport
company on the 4 floors above have the same ratio of staff: parking
spaces. But we are very near shops, etc.


That ank business, it's a killer.


Tank? It's one way to turn rush hour into crush hour, I suppose. The
mpg's not brilliant.

Tom
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 01:23 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Public transport - why?

In message , at 13:50:24 on Thu, 25
Sep 2008, August West remarked:
For example, my office contains about 100 engineers, but there are
only 5 parking spaces for the two floors we are on. The ank & transport
company on the 4 floors above have the same ratio of staff: parking
spaces. But we are very near shops, etc.

That ank business, it's a killer.


Tank? It's one way to turn rush hour into crush hour, I suppose. The
mpg's not brilliant.


bank dank hank lank rank sank tank wank yank

Take your pick as to the most likely!


Angel Trains is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland; HSBC Rail (formerly
Eversholt Leasing) by err, HSBC; and Porterbrook by Abbey National; so
that's three possible "bank and transport" companies.
--
Roland Perry
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 04:05 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
Default Public transport - why?

Not in Scotland now, but bus costs me nothing (Old Codger's Pass),
long-distance coach is half fare.

Stopped using a car...

Motorbike for fun, though.

--
Rusty
Men love women, women love children, children love hamsters.
(Alice Thomas Ellis)
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 04:16 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
Default Public transport - why?

The message
from August West contains these words:

Ah, I misrepresented (missed out a comma): it's one bank, and one
transport company. And it's none of the banks menitoned above, either.
The transport company does trams.


So does Banksy

--
Rusty
Men love women, women love children, children love hamsters.
(Alice Thomas Ellis)
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 25th 08, 04:32 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Default Public transport - why?

In message , Roland Perry
writes

Angel Trains is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland


They sold Angel Trains for £3.6 billion to a group lead by Babcock &
Brown
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7452205.stm
--
David


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pedicabs: a public nuisance on the public highway Robin9 London Transport 13 December 26th 11 07:23 PM
Why People Won't Use Public Transport in London CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North London Transport 34 February 16th 04 10:00 PM
Public transport in London in 18*7*9 MorrisJ2 London Transport 1 November 9th 03 06:33 AM
Public transport in London in 1829 Anoracart London Transport 6 November 7th 03 04:59 PM
Public Transport Expansion Paul Weaver London Transport 21 October 7th 03 10:24 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017