On Nov 25, 5:05*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, solar penguin wrote:
Andrew Heenan wrote:

You are still wrong (and an idiot) and will likely stay that way.

Ah. *Your pro-Oyster argument descends to abuse. That usually means you
know you can't win the argument with facts.

In this case, i think it means he's tried facts, and found them completely
ineffective.

Actually, he hasn't. He is a wind-up artist who solar penguin would
do best to ignore. I am sure that he is the same person as "Adrian"
from the way that he initially appears to contribute to the
discussion, then gradually slips in some deliberate misrepresentations
of what people have said before descending into a stream of abusive
non-sequiturs.

It's a very skilful kind of trolling. I understand solar penguin's
frustrations, but he shouldn't get hooked into this kind of flame war.