On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:01:26 +0000, Steve Firth wrote:
NM wrote:

You are a little bit out,

I don't think so, look at the number on the door.

it's down the street a bit more, look for
the eco caravan in the front garden.

It's the same property that someone posed in front of with his bike +
trailer.

Well, I for one am disappointed.

Not only does the arch-anarchist live in a bog-standard semi, but he's
got single-glazed wood-framed windows as well. Not very "eco", Duhg.

It's far & away the tattiest house on the street too. Rather like its
owner.

--
Cheers!
Ade.

AdeV wrote:

Not only does the arch-anarchist live in a bog-standard semi, but he's
got single-glazed wood-framed windows as well. Not very "eco", Duhg.

It's a bog-standard council semi at that.

I caught a really dreaful old bunch of bull**** on Radio 4 last week. A
play about trying to achieve a zero emissions lifestyle. It was crap. It
also featured George Monbiot and a couple of other eco-mentalists
playing themselves.

Most of the scenarios were set up so that Monbiot et al could step in,
act smug, push their agenda and claim that XXX would save tonnes of
carbon per annum. However this is the sort of crap that Duhg believes.

Guess what single activity they condemned the most?

Retired people living alone at a distance from their family, hence using
up resources that could be used by an entire family. Monbio claimed that
old people living alone consume vastly more than their fair share of
resources. That sounds just like someone we know and barely tolerate.

In the play they forced the grandfather to go and live with his
children.

Steve Firth wrote:

In the play they forced the grandfather to go and live with his
children.

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp

"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
...
..

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

No speeka da englis argo?

Toommy wrote:


"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
... .

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

No speeka da englis argo?

Is that a different language?

So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

Carry on.

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp

On 21 Mar, 07:42, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Toommy wrote:

"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
... �.

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

No speeka da englis argo?

Is that a different language?

So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I think you misunderstand Toomy's point. His complaint was not that
there was a typo - it is that there there were not enough typos. If
you'd written something like "I wonder fuxxin if when of mong the TFL
looks grandparents threatnin after his", with a suitable amount of
dribble running down our chin whilst doing so, the retarded **** might
have understood you. As you wrote it, however, Toomtard didn't stand
a chance of understanding.

"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
...


So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the michael out
of me and never saw you attack them

Toommy wrote:


"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
...


So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been
'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not
commented as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane
(insane) ramblings and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the
michael out of me and never saw you attack them

... and yet again you somehow totally **** up what you're trying to say
so it makes little to no sense and (yet again, again!) adds to the
evidence of your utter stupidity.

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp

On 23 Mar, 15:38, "Toommy" wrote:
"Paul - xxx" wrote in ...



So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT �some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the michael out
of me and never saw you attack them

Hey, Toomy, what will you do for wanks now Jade is dead? Back to
fantasising about sucking Gollum's cock, is it?

On 21 Mar, 01:14, (Steve Firth) wrote:
AdeV wrote:
Not only does the arch-anarchist live in a bog-standard semi, but he's
got single-glazed wood-framed windows as well. Not very "eco", Duhg.

It's a bog-standard council semi at that.

I caught a really dreaful old bunch of bull**** on Radio 4 last week. A
play about trying to achieve a zero emissions lifestyle. It was crap. It
also featured George Monbiot and a couple of other eco-mentalists
playing themselves.

I heard it too. It really was a load of old ****e, wasn't it? I
caught it halfway through, and thought it was quite a funny parody.
My mrs then said that it wasn't supposed to be funny ...

Most of the scenarios were set up so that Monbiot et al could step in,
act smug, push their agenda and claim that XXX would save tonnes of
carbon per annum. However this is the sort of crap that Duhg thinks everyone else should be forced to do.

I've corrected the last sentence above - hope that's OK.

Guess what single activity they condemned the most?

Retired people living alone at a distance from their family, hence using
up resources that could be used by an entire family. Monbio claimed that
old people living alone consume vastly more than their fair share of
resources. That sounds just like someone we know and barely tolerate.

In the play they forced the grandfather to go and live with his
children.

I suspect that might fall foul of the European Convention of Human
Rights, as constituting either torture or a cruel and unusual
punishment.

thinks

Perhaps the CIA could use Mr Bollen as a way of breaking terror
suspects. "Tell us where the next bombing will take place, or Bollen
will explain two ozones again".