Toommy wrote:


"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
... .

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

No speeka da englis argo?

Is that a different language?

So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

Carry on.

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp

On 21 Mar, 07:42, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Toommy wrote:

"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
... �.

I wonder of the mong looks after his grandparents?

No speeka da englis argo?

Is that a different language?

So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I think you misunderstand Toomy's point. His complaint was not that
there was a typo - it is that there there were not enough typos. If
you'd written something like "I wonder fuxxin if when of mong the TFL
looks grandparents threatnin after his", with a suitable amount of
dribble running down our chin whilst doing so, the retarded **** might
have understood you. As you wrote it, however, Toomtard didn't stand
a chance of understanding.

"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
...


So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the michael out
of me and never saw you attack them

Toommy wrote:


"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
...


So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been
'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not
commented as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane
(insane) ramblings and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the
michael out of me and never saw you attack them

... and yet again you somehow totally **** up what you're trying to say
so it makes little to no sense and (yet again, again!) adds to the
evidence of your utter stupidity.

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp

On 23 Mar, 15:38, "Toommy" wrote:
"Paul - xxx" wrote in ...



So you now resort to poking fun at typos .. 'of' should have been 'if'.

Most normal people would have realised this and probably not commented
as it's generally coherent, unlike your usual inane (insane) ramblings
and incoherent drivel.

I agree BUT �some of the dear sweet people here enjoy taking the michael out
of me and never saw you attack them

Hey, Toomy, what will you do for wanks now Jade is dead? Back to
fantasising about sucking Gollum's cock, is it?

"BrianW" wrote in message
...

Hey, Toomy, what will you do for wanks now Jade is dead? Back to
fantasising about sucking Gollum's cock, is it?

I'd be behind you in that queue (and there's a hole other story there