Your post contradicts the subject line.

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:


Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

B2003

In article , () wrote:

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:

Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

Oh dear!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:27:10 -0500
wrote:


In article , () wrote:

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:

Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

Oh dear!

So the things I posted - the blocked dot matrix indicator and the driver not
bothering to wait - were indicative of high intellect on the part of the staff
then?

Hmm , interesting.

B2003

In article , () wrote:

On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:27:10 -0500 wrote:

In article , () wrote:

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:

Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

Oh dear!

So the things I posted - the blocked dot matrix indicator and the
driver not bothering to wait - were indicative of high intellect on
the part of the staff then?

Hmm , interesting.

It's the way you tell 'em!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On Aug 4, 8:31�pm, wrote:
In article , () wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:27:10 -0500 wrote:

In article , () wrote:

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:

Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

Oh dear!

So the things I posted - the blocked dot matrix indicator and the
driver not bothering to wait - were indicative of high intellect on
the part of the staff then?

Hmm , interesting.

It's the way you tell 'em!

--
Colin Rosenstiel- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Admittedly, I am often the first to point out the grammatical mistakes
of others, but this should not be allowed to obscure the valid point
being made by Boltar about L.U.L. and its staff. Any organisation
that has room in its ranks for the likes of Bob Crowe is fatally
flawed.

But, more to the point, about bloody-minded staff: a few weeks ago, a
particularly bolshie specimen was in charge of a Westbound, late-night
District Line train. All along the route, from Temple to Earl's Court,
the train had been advertised as an Ealing Broadway train.

At Earl's Court, the driver announced "This train is now calling at
all stations to Parson's Green" - as the doors were closing!

He must have got a particularly big hard-on when he saw literally
hundreds of passengers getting out at West Brompton, in a particularly
heavy rain shower.

Marc.

In article
,
() wrote:

On Aug 4, 8:31_pm, wrote:
In article , () wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:27:10 -0500
wrote:

In article , ()
wrote:

On 4 Aug 2009 08:04:55 GMT
James Farrar wrote:

Your post contradicts the subject line.

Care to explain?

Oh dear!

So the things I posted - the blocked dot matrix indicator and the
driver not bothering to wait - were indicative of high intellect on
the part of the staff then?

Hmm , interesting.

It's the way you tell 'em!

Admittedly, I am often the first to point out the grammatical mistakes
of others, but this should not be allowed to obscure the valid point
being made by Boltar about L.U.L. and its staff. Any organisation
that has room in its ranks for the likes of Bob Crowe is fatally flawed.

But, more to the point, about bloody-minded staff: a few weeks ago, a
particularly bolshie specimen was in charge of a Westbound, late-night
District Line train. All along the route, from Temple to Earl's Court,
the train had been advertised as an Ealing Broadway train.

At Earl's Court, the driver announced "This train is now calling at
all stations to Parson's Green" - as the doors were closing!

He must have got a particularly big hard-on when he saw literally
hundreds of passengers getting out at West Brompton, in a particularly
heavy rain shower.

I'm surprised no-one pulled the emergency alarm at Earl's Court!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 4 Aug, 23:03, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:51:56 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
Admittedly, I am often the first to point out the grammatical mistakes
of others, but this should not be allowed to obscure the valid point
being made by Boltar about *L.U.L. and its staff. Any organisation
that has room in its ranks for the likes of Bob Crowe is fatally
flawed.

You think Bob Crow is a LUL employee? *I think you'll find he's a full
time union employee and LUL has little choice put to deal with his union
in collective bargaining. The other point here is that he is simply the
figurehead - it is the union exec who take the decisions re settlements
etc.

There's been a bit of a shortage of gratuitous abuse of Bob Crow
lately, so this was probably just redressing the balance. Have you
noticed what he's done to the weather lately?

On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:29:52 +0100
Paul Corfield wrote:
I suspect people are referring to the lack of an apostrophe in your
message title.

Picking up on minor points of grammar - the last resort of the terminally
stupid who have nothing else to say.

Still it was nice to have you back moaning about LUL. Sensible views
about bendy buses came as an enormous shock.

Normal service is now resumed.

B2003