Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#252
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#253
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#254
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#255
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#256
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#257
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
|
#258
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
"Conor" wrote in message
... In article , says... Of course! They moan about expensive housing, but you can be sure they would object to any new housing too. And new housing costs how much? Oh yeah, the same as the others. It does if you just build one or two new houses. However if we did not have such tight planning regulation and VAT disincentives for renovating old buildings, there would have been a much greater consistent supply over the last few years which would almost certainly have dampened the house price inflation. -- Conor "Cogito Eggo Sum" - "I think, therefore I am a waffle" |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:06:45 +0000 (UTC), Mike Bristow
wrote: Areas within an hours commute of central london by car include Nice attempt at diversion, You'll find no mention of commuting to central london by car in my post. Yes, that's nice, but it is irrelevant when talking about being an hours commute from central london. Oh really ? It takes 32 minutes to travel the 30 miles from my local station to kings cross. greg -- Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland. I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan. You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide. |
#260
|
|||
|
|||
reducing congestion
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:28:45 GMT, Tony Bryer wrote:
In article , Greg Hennessy wrote: Try the nationalised planning system courtesy of the town and country planning act 1947. A spiteful piece of legislation whose only purpose was to outlaw the mechanism by which 1.5+ million privately built, financed and *affordable* houses in the 20s and 30s. Couldn't have that doncha know. But, as you imply, the Conservatives, far from scrapping it, have embraced and extended it for their own ends. You'll get no argument from me on that score. Politicians dont like surrendering centralised power. You'll hear them harp on about the need to accept the discipline of market forces when you are shutting down a mine or steelworks, but not when someone wants to replace a suburban bungalow or two with a block of flats. I want a return to the pre war situation where local authorities and local authorities alone decided that is was in the best interests of their rate payers to grant permission to build high quality affordable housing at densities of 8-12/acre for the equivalent of 20-25k in todays money. greg -- Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland. I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan. You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Legal challenges and congestion charging for 30 second journey leaving zone? | London Transport | |||
The effects of a road congestion tax | London Transport | |||
Congestion charge cheat | London Transport | |||
Crapita bailed-out over congestion charging | London Transport | |||
Extending the congestion charge zone | London Transport |