Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
In message , Brian Watson
writes As there would be no terminus there would be nowhere for the trains to make up any time and this would decrease reliability. So how does this work now at the Heathrow end of the Picc or, come to that, on the Circle line? Heathrow 123 is regarded as the terminus. Trains are booked for about a 7-8 minute stand there. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
Would it be totally impractical for all or most Met journeys to/from
Chesham to run as through services to Baker Street as opposed to mainly a branch shuttle with the odd peak-time run to Aldgate or wherever. Just seems a bit messy compared to most other lines which tend to provide through services to all their extremities. It would be possible but I doubt enough people use Chesham off-peak to make it worthwhile. But equally anyone from Amersham would surely use Chiltern. If anyone used Chesham at all, a better off-peak pattern might be making the LU Fast trains Cheshams. Also would it not be feasible for Central Line trains serving Hainault to run alternately clockwise/anticlockwise round the Hainault loop and back towards the City? As there would be no terminus there would be nowhere for the trains to make up any time and this would decrease reliability. What might be a better idea would be to make all trains via Newbury Park terminate at Hainault and send a few trains an hour to Hainault via Woodford. This might finally do something about the abysmal ridership at Roding Valley. Are there any changes to traditional route options on LU that might be worth doing even if the above two are hopeless non-starters? I believe LU are considering changing the sub-surface lines. Trains would go Hammersmith - Edgware Road - Liverpool Street - South Kensington - Edgware Road where it would reverse and head back the other way. This would have the advantage of giving Circle trains somewhere to make up any time they have lost. This is a stupid idea. It would just end up sharing terminal platforms with the Edgware Rd District, so the amount of recovery time available would be necessarily tiny. The route would effectively become Hammersmith to Hammersmith with a reversing move in the middle. On time performance towards Hammersmith would be appalling, unless an extra wait were added at Aldgate, which rather defeats the point of the whole exercise. A better plan might be to replace the Circle with a Wimbledon - Wimbledon Loop, or alternatively to run Hammersmith - Aldgate - Wimbledon and Wimbledon - Edgware Rd - Whitechapel. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Richard J. wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Sat, 29 May 2004, Sharon & Gordon Thomson wrote: Are there any changes to traditional route options on LU that might be worth doing even if the above two are hopeless non-starters? How about terminating the Metropolitan line at Whitechapel instead of Aldgate? Like the fact that, with only two tracks between Aldgate East and Whitechapel, and a flat junction at Aldgate East, you couldn't fit in the H&C, District and Met services and expect to get a reliable service. This is one reason why the H&C is "seriously crappy", as it has to contend with at least 4 flat junctions between Paddington and Aldgate East. Dang those flat junctions! So, how did it work when the Met _did_ go to Whitechapel? Or am i imagining that? Did (what is now) the H&C terminate at Aldgate or something? tom -- Basically, at any given time, most people in the world are wasting time. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 May 2004, Richard J. wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: On Sat, 29 May 2004, Sharon & Gordon Thomson wrote: Are there any changes to traditional route options on LU that might be worth doing even if the above two are hopeless non-starters? How about terminating the Metropolitan line at Whitechapel instead of Aldgate? Like the fact that, with only two tracks between Aldgate East and Whitechapel, and a flat junction at Aldgate East, you couldn't fit in the H&C, District and Met services and expect to get a reliable service. This is one reason why the H&C is "seriously crappy", as it has to contend with at least 4 flat junctions between Paddington and Aldgate East. Dang those flat junctions! So, how did it work when the Met _did_ go to Whitechapel? Or am i imagining that? Did (what is now) the H&C terminate at Aldgate or something? The only time the Metropolitan line went to Whitechapel was when the Hammersmith & City was still part of the Met. Even then it was still the Hammersmith trains that went to Whitechapel. Peter Smyth |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
"James" wrote in message
om... I believe LU are considering changing the sub-surface lines. Trains would go Hammersmith - Edgware Road - Liverpool Street - South Kensington - Edgware Road where it would reverse and head back the other way. This would have the advantage of giving Circle trains somewhere to make up any time they have lost. This is a stupid idea. It would just end up sharing terminal platforms with the Edgware Rd District, so the amount of recovery time available would be necessarily tiny. The route would effectively become Hammersmith to Hammersmith with a reversing move in the middle. On time performance towards Hammersmith would be appalling, unless an extra wait were added at Aldgate, which rather defeats the point of the whole exercise. A better plan might be to replace the Circle with a Wimbledon - Wimbledon Loop, or alternatively to run Hammersmith - Aldgate - Wimbledon and Wimbledon - Edgware Rd - Whitechapel. The version I've heard - admittedly only within this group - was that the Circle, H&C and Wimbleware lines would be replaced by two services: 1) Wimbledon-Earl's Court-Edgware Road-Liverpool Street-Barking 2) Hammersmith-Edgware Road-Liverpool Steet-Victoria-Edgware Road Jonn |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
A better plan might be to replace the Circle with a Wimbledon -
Wimbledon Loop, or alternatively to run Hammersmith - Aldgate - Wimbledon and Wimbledon - Edgware Rd - Whitechapel. The version I've heard - admittedly only within this group - was that the Circle, H&C and Wimbleware lines would be replaced by two services: 1) Wimbledon-Earl's Court-Edgware Road-Liverpool Street-Barking 2) Hammersmith-Edgware Road-Liverpool Steet-Victoria-Edgware Road Jonn Have a look he http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/SS...%20Upgrade.htm I think this is as close to the horse's mouth as we are likely to get! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Scope for Changing LU Route Linkings
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (dan) wrote: Have a look he http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/SS...%20Upgrade.htm I think this is as close to the horse's mouth as we are likely to get! Sorry to come along rather late but where does the handing over of the District's Richmond branch to Crossrail come into this? The intention is that the Upminster to Richmond services will just be shared out between Ealing Broadway and Wimbledon. Actually I think that's Crossrail's proposal; I don't know if LU have expressed a view. The rumour is that we shall find out on Tuesday (20 July) whether Crossrail, or this bit of it, will actually happen. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing at Camden Town | London Transport | |||
Opnion needed - Changing lines | London Transport | |||
Green Park station, changing from Victoria to Piccadilly | London Transport | |||
Commons debate on increasing Crossrail scope | London Transport News | |||
Changing railstation names | London Transport |