Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Osborn wrote:
Robin May wrote: Stephen worheedatworheeddotf9dotcodotuk wrote the following in: news ![]() On this subject I've read that all the stations on the Lewisham extension were built so they could either handle or be easily extended to handle 3 car trains. I can't see how at Cutty Sark. It's only big enough for 2 car trains and as is it's a deep level tunnel it is going to be quite difficult to extend isn't it? Are you sure it's not big enough? Last time I was there I think I had a look and I seem to remember thinking that it probably was big enough for three car trains. Whilst waiting for a DLR at Lewisham several months ago, I read a poster that said that they planned to extend the service on that section to three cars. It said that some stations would have to be extended to cope with this but that one of the stations (South Quay IIRC) could not be extended in situ and so would have to be relocated, albeit only 100-200 yds. The thing that immediately struck me as odd was that, for a two car service, some of the stations had been built unable to cope with anything longer. What struck me as even more odd was that, this lack of forethought having already (5years) caused a problem, the new South Quay was only going to be long enough to cater for three car trains. Cutty Sark isn't long enough for three cars. Selective door opening will be used to get around the problem at that particular station. Lengthening platforms here would be very expensive (£30m), requiring closure of the railway during construction and potentially needs some buildings to be demolished at the surface, in a conservation area - so it's a no-no. It's relatively easy to extend all the other platforms on the Lewisham extension. Four-car trains were considered as part of the planning process but were rejected at this stage as the infrastructure works would be prohibitively disruptive. A light railway just isn't designed for the sort of passenger numbers the DLR is now expected to deal with, and I think these 3-car works are designed to plug the gap; the Woolwich extension will make things worse, but hopefully the Jubilee signalling upgrade and car addition will mitigate matters. Crossrail is needed. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock | London Transport | |||
DLR City Airport branch | London Transport | |||
DLR City Airport Extension | London Transport | |||
DLR three car trains - City Airport extension | London Transport | |||
White City station on Hammermith & City | London Transport |