Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Sudbury Hill (Harrow) lack of information
On 9 May 2005, TheOneKEA wrote:
John Rowland wrote: Only their long distance passengers. Their lack of interest in serving local London journeys is blatant and seemingly out of character. I suspect that this treatment of local London passengers is not entirely down to any malicious reasons I'd probably agree - Hanlon's razor and all that. Perhaps the reason they're not too bothered about the inner suburban services is that the ridership is so low, Chiltern don't consider them a significant customer base, and so they don't devote much energy or money to looking after them. Of course, the other way of looking at it is that if they did take more care over suburban services, they might become a more significant customer group! - I would point to infrastructure constraints as the primary reason, closely followed by lack of ridership, proximity to higher-frequency transport and unsuitable journey opportunities - does anyone living at Northolt Park, Sudbury Hill, Sudbury & Harrow Road or Wembley Stadium want to go anywhere that can be reached from Marylebone or the Ruislips? That is the major problem with Chiltern. Roll on Crossrail 4! tom -- .... the gripping first chapter, which literally grips you because it's printed on a large clamp. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sudbury Town | London Transport | |||
London Overground - lack of engineering works information | London Transport | |||
Harrow on the Hill to White City - 2 different fares??? | London Transport | |||
Sudbury | London Transport | |||
Harrow on the Hill to Ruislip | London Transport |