London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old August 28th 05, 07:25 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,995
Default Piccadilly Line - Emma Clarke Announcements

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:25:40 +0100, Clive
wrote:

In message , Paul Corfield
writes
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:35:51 GMT, "Gareth Packer"
wrote:


It will install new train
control systems on Metronet lines to improve safety and reduce headways,
although the new system will not be 'moving block'.


I understood the reason why the jubilee line was late to Stratford was
in problems over "Moving Block" signalling. Have they still not got
this item right yet? Couldn't LUL insist on such a system which when
working could be seriously advantageous to all the network? Private
companies were brought in to do the work, if they can't deliver
shouldn't they either be sacked as a common worker would or be penalised
until they came up with the goods? Or are punters just cattle who feed
the big corporations and have to put up with inferior service?


Alcatel are dealing with the Jubilee Line therefore the Metronet /
Westinghouse reference is not relevant. As Colin has mentioned in
another post the moving block proposed for the Jubilee Line had to be
scrapped because there was no chance of Westinghouse delivering it, it
would never have been ready for the planned opening date and safety
approval could never have been achieved either. As always with schemes
of the scale of the Jubilee Line Extension a series of claims have
settled to deal with delivery or non delivery of parts of the original
contract. I do not know how the signalling contract was dealt with.

LUL has specified an output for line upgrades. It is not specifying or
insisting on the technology because if it does and it doesn't work the
Infracos have no incentive to fix it. They would also send LU the bill
for fixing it and also for any abatements under the performance regime.
Under PPP they make the choices between track design, power usage, train
design and functionality / capacity and signalling and control systems.
They have to comply with our standards and make sure the trains can be
used by passengers and staff safely and effectively but otherwise the
performance risk is transferred to them.
--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
London PA Voice Emma Clarke F ired for Slamming Tube Rev. CMOT TMPV London Transport 35 December 6th 07 12:47 AM
Announcements on Central Line No Name London Transport 2 October 9th 07 04:00 PM
Piccadilly Line Automated Announcements Barry Salter London Transport 14 November 14th 06 04:51 PM
New Northern Line announcements [email protected] London Transport 0 December 13th 03 08:47 AM
New Northern Line announcements [email protected] London Transport 0 December 11th 03 04:47 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017