London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old August 17th 06, 01:15 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2004
Posts: 263
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

Neil Williams wrote:

Joe Patrick wrote:

Is it actually possible - not only does such a button actually exist,


No, but (assuming it wasn't a bendy, where I believe the releases
aren't just another door button but actually unlock something) the
driver could sit there and keep pressing the close button. I've seen
this done to stop kids getting on after messing with the release button
on the outside.

I once saw a passenger use the emergency door release to open the front
door when the bus had stopped at the traffic lights at Bexleyheath, a
few metres short of the bus interchange! The driver didn't need to use
the close button, as the passenger pushed the close button a second or
two later as he stepped off.

--
Aidan Stanger
http://www.bettercrossrail.co.uk

  #34   Report Post  
Old August 17th 06, 07:07 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 70
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

In article ,
(Aidan Stanger) wrote:

I once saw a passenger use the emergency door release to open the front
door when the bus had stopped at the traffic lights at Bexleyheath, a
few metres short of the bus interchange! The driver didn't need to use
the close button, as the passenger pushed the close button a second or
two later as he stepped off.


On a 436 bendy on the Vauxhall Bridge Road I saw several people jump
out after one had used the emergency door release. They had all
spotted the masses of ticket inspectors who were doing their regular
monthly fare-dodging check.

--
http://www.election.demon.co.uk
"We can also agree that Saddam Hussein most certainly has chemical and biolog-
ical weapons and is working towards a nuclear capability. The dossier contains
confirmation of information that we either knew or most certainly should have
been willing to assume." - Menzies Campbell, 24th September 2002.
  #35   Report Post  
Old August 18th 06, 11:53 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 191
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

Mizter T wrote:
Martin Underwood wrote:

Martin Underwood wrote in message
:

Every Strangers Eyes wrote in message
:

I got off the bus feeling very self rightous but what are peoples
thoughts on this?
Tell the driver you're going to throw up. They soon let you off.
It's worth a try, especially if you go up to his cab and lean in
towards him as you say it!!!

When buses are on a planned diversion, so the drivers make any effort
to warn the passengers beforehand, so as to say "this is the last
stop [before the diversion] where you can get off for the next n
miles"? Silly question - I'm sure they don't - that would involve
thinking of their passengers' needs before the needs of Health and
Safety.

Sorry, that should read "When buses are on a planned diversion, DO the
drivers make any effort..."


Occasionally they do, more often than not they don't. Would be great if
it became standard practice.

Nobody, apart from you, has made any connection to health and safety
rules precluding drivers making announcements. Basic common sense would
suggest that as buses are now often fitted with PA systems there is no
such exclusion. Basic common sense would also suggest that
announcements are not best made when a driver is negotiating a
difficult section of road.

The lack of announcements woud appear to be a case of poor practice,
perhaps in part because the lack of PA systems until recently means
there hasn't been time for such a good practice to emerge, rather a
result of the ever present H&S gremlin that many appear to believe is
perpetually lurking in the shadows pulling the strings on order to
frustrate them.


I think announcements when driving conditions permit would be a big
bonus. I've noticed some bendy bus drivers making them. I'd really
appreciate announcements that a bus is going to terminate short -
sometimes they change destination mid-route without telling anyone,
which is extremely frustrating.

The new iBus system should take care of routine announcements for
upcoming stops.


--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London


  #36   Report Post  
Old August 18th 06, 12:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

Dave Arquati wrote:

(snip)

I think announcements when driving conditions permit would be a big
bonus. I've noticed some bendy bus drivers making them. I'd really
appreciate announcements that a bus is going to terminate short -
sometimes they change destination mid-route without telling anyone,
which is extremely frustrating.

The new iBus system should take care of routine announcements for
upcoming stops.


That said sometimes the announcements can be confusing in themselves. I
was on a number 12 going north when the driver received instructions to
stop short of his destination - his announcement was along the lines of
"this bus will no longer be going to Oxford, it will now be terminating
at Trafalgar, to go to Oxford please get on the bus behind me".

I was left wondering whether if I got on the next I really could get to
Oxford for 80p, albeit taking ages and stopping every quarter of a
mile. Meanwhile I wondered what would happen if I stayed put - would I
be transported to south west Spain, even back to 1805! To be fair
everyone seemed to understand his announcement and dissapointingly
no-one else seemed to be even remotely amused.

Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some
routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind
reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a
visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way
(IYSWIM!).

I'm not sure about the new iBus system - specifically, about the
automatic announcements that'll be part of the system. It could be
really annoying! Perhaps only key stops could have announcements, such
as full (i.e. non-request) bus stops.

  #37   Report Post  
Old August 20th 06, 07:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 842
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

In message . com,
Mizter T writes
Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some
routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind
reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a
visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!).


*Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it
done in Paris but never in London!

(Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as
Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.)
--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk
  #38   Report Post  
Old August 20th 06, 07:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 191
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

Ian Jelf wrote:
In message . com,
Mizter T writes
Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some
routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind
reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a
visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!).


*Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it
done in Paris but never in London!


I've seen it done on the 207, when there's a short working from
Shepherd's Bush to Ealing Hospital or Acton Tram Depot; the blind says
the destination with "Part route only" below it in smaller type, all
black-on-yellow.

I think it's very useful, and should be extended to other routes if
possible.

(Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as
Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.)



--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London
  #39   Report Post  
Old August 20th 06, 08:52 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,995
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:04:18 +0100, Ian Jelf
wrote:

In message . com,
Mizter T writes
Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some
routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind
reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a
visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!).


*Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it
done in Paris but never in London!


A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of
special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless to
say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not) is now
stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to the
hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses on
recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination
displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain
locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s and
the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493.
This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be
used on route 493 blinds!

(Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as
Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.)


Yes - it is an elegant solution if you have electronic displays or four
track number blinds. I suspect it would not work on conventional blinds
in London as you'd probably need an E variant for every number which for
some garages would result in blinds that were too big for the blind
boxes.
--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!

  #40   Report Post  
Old August 20th 06, 09:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 842
Default Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct?

In message , Paul Corfield
writes
A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of
special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless
to say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not)

Boggle

is now stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to
the hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses
on recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination
displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain
locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s

This single line display with no "via" points is truly *ludicrous*. I
hope it's a fad.

and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route
493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond
can be used on route 493 blinds!

Sanity prevails! Now to work on those "via" points.......

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please stand behind the line as the train approaches and let passengers off before boarding [email protected] London Transport 5 June 29th 11 10:41 AM
Oyster Exits at Kings Cross St Pancras not being recorded Tim Fardell London Transport 13 February 15th 10 11:39 AM
Luggage from T5 opening fiasco now being auctioned off CJB London Transport 1 July 7th 08 09:10 PM
being let through barriers with an Oyster, a couple of Qs [email protected] London Transport 15 January 16th 04 12:05 PM
Oystercard 'price capping' not being introduced at fares revision Robin Mayes London Transport 16 December 15th 03 03:55 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017